looks like the commercial version of DCC.
anyone else from this list spammed? where did they get their victim
list?
the want to help protect the internet from the next big spam outbreak.
Reputation services can play a significant role in blocking the next big
spam or malware outbreak, includi
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Is your request different from the timings percentiles report that
>> currently exists ? Example at the end of:
>>
>>http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/example-amavis-detail10
>>
>> It is obtained with detail level >= 5.
>
> this is what I
MrC wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Is your request different from the timings percentiles report that
> currently exists ? Example at the end of:
>
>http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/example-amavis-detail10
>
> It is obtained with detail level >= 5.
this is what I'm thinking about, but as well a
Curtis Maurand wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been having trouble where outgoing mail from authenticated users
> is not only being checked, but rejected as spam. For example I wrote up
> a set of instructions for a customer, attached screenshots and sent it.
> It got 12 hits including Fuzzyocr and
Robert Brooks wrote:
> MrC wrote:
>> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
>> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental
>> changes in the summary presentation, and am looking for feedback on
>> that in particular.
>
> one thing I'd like to see is
Hello,
I've been having trouble where outgoing mail from authenticated users
is not only being checked, but rejected as spam. For example I wrote up
a set of instructions for a customer, attached screenshots and sent it.
It got 12 hits including Fuzzyocr and I know that this was not spam.
MrC wrote:
> Benedict - feel free to drop me a line if you have questions or
> improvement requests. I have just made some recent experimental changes
> in the summary presentation, and am looking for feedback on that in
> particular.
one thing I'd like to see is the percentiles for total time
