Nitin Bhadauria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am getting warning from clamav
>
> Oct 7 15:59:03 mail amavis[14230]: (14230-03-21) (!!)ask_av
> (ClamAV-clamd) FAILED - unexpected result:
> /var/lib/amavis/tmp/amavis-20081007T155642-14230/parts: Access denied.
> ERROR\n
> Oct 7 15:59:03
Clifton Royston wrote:
> For those who haven't yet noticed, the SecuritySage DNSBL is
> returning 127.0.0.1 to all queries; this was checked in at least some
> versions of SpamAssassin, so check your configurations. You might be
> using it and not realizing it.
>
> This is not a good way to s
The message thread you pointed to is exactly the one I referenced in
my original post -- regarding postfix and release of quarantine
messages.
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Sorry if you've seen this already, but just in case:
> http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=amavis-user&a=200
I handle all mail via a sendmail milter (amavisd-milter). There is no
if/then/else around the milter submission in sendmail. (nor in
postfix without setting up another MTA instance on a different port)
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Very simple: due to limitations in
Hi there i would like to know the correct syntax to blacklist some
domains that are always spamming. I ´ve got a hard blacklist file and
i´ve been trying different ways for example lets say the domain for the
person who sends spam is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the address changes but for
the domain
Hello folks,
We are trying to use Amavisd::Custom for the first time here, and
we are having some problems. We need some specific emails are
sent to quarantine and not to be delivered to final recipient.
In the past these filers were made using maildrop, and we configured
amavis to have some poli
Hello All,
I am getting warning from clamav
Oct 7 15:59:03 mail amavis[14230]: (14230-03-21) (!!)ask_av
(ClamAV-clamd) FAILED - unexpected result:
/var/lib/amavis/tmp/amavis-20081007T155642-14230/parts: Access denied.
ERROR\n
Oct 7 15:59:03 mail amavis[14230]: (14230-03-21) (!!)WARN: al
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:04:57AM +0200, Stefan Palme wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 15:23 -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> > ...
> > This is not a good way to shut down a DNSBL, but unfortunately not
> > everybody reads the RFCs or is even aware that there is an RFC for
> > DNSBL operators.
>
>
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 15:23 -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> ...
> This is not a good way to shut down a DNSBL, but unfortunately not
> everybody reads the RFCs or is even aware that there is an RFC for
> DNSBL operators.
OT:
I did not find any RFC concerning DSNBL.
Could you tell me the RFC nu
