Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis will not ignore bad headers.

The "dovecot" transport is not configured correctly in master.cf, most probably with "${recipient}" instead of "${us...@${nexthop}": dovecot unix - n n - - pipe flags=DROhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/lib/dovecot/deliver -f ${sender} -d ${us...@${nexthop} -n -m $

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis will not ignore bad headers.

Hi Daniel, On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Daniel Luttermann wrote: > Tom, > >> Basically I have 2 problems. The first problem is that I am trying to get >> amavis-new to pass messages with bad headers. I have $warnbadhsender = undef >> in the amavisd.conf. As I understand things, this is the default and thi

Re: [AMaViS-user] Amavis will not ignore bad headers.

Tom, > Basically I have 2 problems. The first problem is that I am trying to get > amavis-new to pass messages with bad headers. I have $warnbadhsender = undef > in the amavisd.conf. As I understand things, this is the default and this > should allow these messages to just pass through. $warnbadh

[AMaViS-user] Amavis will not ignore bad headers.

Hi all, I am sure I have something mis-configured but I am at a loss what that could be. Basically I have 2 problems. The first problem is that I am trying to get amavis-new to pass messages with bad headers. I have $warnbadhsender = undef in the amavisd.conf. As I understand things, this is the

[AMaViS-user] LDAP Question

Hi all It is possible to insert into my LDAP directory the $banned_filename_re part of amavisd.conf ? I want to read ALL the rules from LDAP, not from the amavisd.conf file... Regards, -- Let Crystal Reports handle the

Re: [AMaViS-user] Delivery Failures From Banned Emails to Sender

Carlos, On 8/5/2009 7:15 AM, Carlos Williams wrote: > I checked and the settings appear to be coming from > "20-debian_default" as follows: > > $final_virus_destiny = D_DISCARD; # (data not lost, see virus > quarantine) > $final_banned_destiny = D_BOUNCE; # D_REJECT when front-end MTA

Re: [AMaViS-user] trying to track down an am:boost=5

MrC wrote: > > > On 8/5/2009 8:18 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> on a system without pen pals, bouncekiller or anything that I can think >> of that would do this, >> >> I keep getting an AMBOOST:5 on emails from cdpublications. > AH.. thanks... I must have missed that. been searching for days

Re: [AMaViS-user] trying to track down an am:boost=5

On 8/5/2009 8:18 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote: > on a system without pen pals, bouncekiller or anything that I can think > of that would do this, > > I keep getting an AMBOOST:5 on emails from cdpublications. > from:Community Health Funding Report ^^

[AMaViS-user] trying to track down an am:boost=5

on a system without pen pals, bouncekiller or anything that I can think of that would do this, I keep getting an AMBOOST:5 on emails from cdpublications. I don't have them in any softwhitelist, or whitelist (that I know of) checked wblisting: elect * from mailaddr where email like '%...@cdpub%

Re: [AMaViS-user] Delivery Failures From Banned Emails to Sender

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: > The sender is probably getting a delivery status notification. > Turn it off by setting:  $final_spam_destiny = D_DISCARD; > instead of D_BOUNCE. Mark, I checked and the settings appear to be coming from "20-debian_default" as follows: $fin

[AMaViS-user] Another SQL quarantine question

Once and email has been rebuilt from the chunks it is stored in, what ways do people use to separate out the email into headers, body attachments etc for displaying them? (I am thinking of displaying them on a web page with perl.) Kind Regards Benedict White Tel: 01444 238070 Tech: 01444 238080

Re: [AMaViS-user] SQl quarantine question

-Original Message- From: Michael Scheidell [mailto:scheid...@secnap.net] Sent: 04 August 2009 21:55 To: Benedict White Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] SQl quarantine question >Benedict White wrote: >> I noticed that Amavisd stores emails in 16KB chunks in M