[AMaViS-user] ot: spamassasin/perl IO::File prob object binmode

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
I am getting mails caught in the deferred q with: -- AFA05B44845 3085241 Thu Feb 11 10:07:31 s...@hotmail.com (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=21117-12, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method "binmode" via package "IO::File" at /usr/lib/perl5/s

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread G. Miliotis
Voytek Eymont wrote: > On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote: > >> On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: >> > >> add to your spamassassin/local.cf score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 >> >> Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different >> location, and amavisd is sti

[AMaViS-user] ot: spamassasin/perl IO::File prob

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
yesterday I was doing spamassasin update, just noticed in my mailq this: --- 3107CB446FB18582 Thu Feb 11 09:25:23 prvs=6500a7815=accountspaya...@xxx.com (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 451 4.5.0 Error in processing, id=32496-02, mime_decode-1 FAILED: Can't locate object method "b

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
> On Thu, February 11, 2010 6:53 am, Voytek Eymont wrote: >> oops, my 'spams' have been sent to spam mailbox, are not in Q... >> >> what the best way to requeue them as 'original sender' ? can I copy actual mail files from /var/mail/vhost/s...@domain mailbox to /var/virusmail, and, then use ama

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 8:33 am, Noel Jones wrote: > On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: > > add to your spamassassin/local.cf score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 > > Wild guess is the new SA version installed to a different > location, and amavisd is still using the old version of SA. Noel, th

Re: [AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Noel Jones
On 2/10/2010 3:06 PM, Voytek Eymont wrote: > several of my users had recently quite a few 'inter-office' emails wrongly > diverted to 'spam user' mailbox: > > us...@thisdom us...@thisdom > 'thisdom' is hosted on the server, but, the users are remote to the > server, mail sent via several diferent i

[AMaViS-user] ot: date issue with sa

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
several of my users had recently quite a few 'inter-office' emails wrongly diverted to 'spam user' mailbox: us...@thisdom us...@thisdom 'thisdom' is hosted on the server, but, the users are remote to the server, mail sent via several diferent isps I've looked at the spam headers, quite a few had

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 6:53 am, Voytek Eymont wrote: > oops, my 'spams' have been sent to spam mailbox, are not in Q... > > what the best way to requeue them as 'original sender' ? OK, this done the trick: email.pl v0.1 usage: email.pl [sender_address] does anyone has a script that will

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 3:21 am, Mark Martinec wrote: > Here is a quick workaround: > + $quar_type = 'F'; Mark, thanks oops, my 'spams' have been sent to spam mailbox, are not in Q... what the best way to requeue them as 'original sender' ? # amavisd-release pHHuN15T1vpc 450 4.5.0 Failur

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Thu, February 11, 2010 3:35 am, Mark Martinec wrote: >> but I don't know what would be the best way to resolve it properly. > > Actually the following might be a more universal solution, > relying on amavisd to decide whether it is a SQL or file-based quarantine, > based on its SQL settings: >

Re: [AMaViS-user] Spam mails gets rewrited subject but not "killed"!?

2010-02-10 Thread Mark Martinec
ClaesBas, > It looks like $sa_kill_level_deflt not working (for me)! > Mailreceiver gets the mail even if Score is way above kill level. > local_domains seems to be right, due to subject rewrite. > > Why does it get delivered and not "killed"? Either the spam destiny was D_PASS, or recipient was

Re: [AMaViS-user] Insecure dependency in open while running with -T switch at /usr/local/sb in/amavisd line 2994.

2010-02-10 Thread Mark Martinec
Petr, > >> I've recently upgraded FreeBSD 7.0 box to amavisd-new 2.6.4 and > >> amavisd-milter 1.4.0. > > > > Was perl also upgraded during the process, or did its version remain > > the same? Which versions of perl are we talking about? Which version > > of amavisd-new was there running before wh

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Mark Martinec
> but I don't know what would be the best way to resolve it properly. Actually the following might be a more universal solution, relying on amavisd to decide whether it is a SQL or file-based quarantine, based on its SQL settings: --- amavisd-release~2008-08-05 18:49:30.0 +0200 +++ a

Re: [AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Mark Martinec
Voytek, > I have several false-positives I need to release (old spam assasin 'date > in the past' rules, etc) amavisd-new-2.6.4 > > but I get: > > # amavisd-release pHHuN15T1vpc > 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at (eval 95) line 343, The quarantine type-guessing logic in am

[AMaViS-user] release problems: 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at

2010-02-10 Thread Voytek Eymont
I have several false-positives I need to release (old spam assasin 'date in the past' rules, etc) but I get: # amavisd-release pHHuN15T1vpc 450 4.5.0 Failure: SQL quarantine code not enabled at (eval 95) line 343, line 4. # amavisd -V amavisd-new-2.6.4 (20090625) --- Feb 11 00:18:28