RE: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd Lost Connection...

2006-03-26 Thread Dustin Humm
Gary, Thanx for the input! I already have $max_servers set at 5...and I have ensured that Postfix & Amavisd are matching (causes chaos when they don't match!) Also, I am definitely using Net::Server 0.90 - already been through the chaos, too, of 0.91 & 0.92...so we should be good there as well..

RE: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd Lost Connection...

2006-03-25 Thread Dustin Humm
'Grep'-ing the log shows nothing related to the keywords you listed - that, I find, is unexpected...it seems to me that I would see some of those at least, giving an indication of something that's not right...but no go... We are still getting the errors...and it seems that we get one typically eve

RE: [AMaViS-user] Amavisd Lost Connection...

2006-03-25 Thread Dustin Humm
Gary, The time spent scanning is highly variable - anywhere from 300ms through, in some cases, 20+ seconds...which I've always thought was high...but have never really paid attention until now that I'm seeing something going on... I did raise the log level to 3 to see if anything was strange -

[AMaViS-user] Amavisd Lost Connection...

2006-03-25 Thread Dustin Humm
Greetings, I am seeing the following in our mail logs: ... lost connection with localhost[127.0.0.1] while sending end of data -- message may be sent more than once ... Looks like Amavisd is closing the connection on Postfix, but I don't know why. I have verified our settings in all of AMAVIS

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
Guys, Thanx for the comments... I think the light is starting to dimly glow above my head! However, if I add these IP hosts to $mynetworks, wouldn't I then need to create some type of access map that explicitly denies any sender addresses from the domains we protect. In other words: smtpd_sende

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule... At 06:51 PM 3/15/2006, Dustin Humm wrote: >We protect roughly 25 domains with >postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of >these domains need to be able to talk to one another. >Although we are >using this system for incom

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
t: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:30 AM To: Dustin Humm Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule... Hi Dustin, Dustin Humm wrote: > We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of > these domains need to be able to talk to one anothe

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Dustin Humm
Gary, Thank you for the information. However, let me provide a little more info to clarify our situation: We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of these domains need to be able to talk to one another. Although we are using this system for incoming mail only, we, ob

[AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Dustin Humm
I need to create a rule that evaluates both the To: & From: addresses (domains) in an e-mail. I want to mark/tag/block/whatever e-mails that have the same originating & destination domains (i.e. the sender is spoofing the recipient domain). I have played around with some meta rules in SpamAssassi

[AMaViS-user] Meaning?

2005-08-02 Thread Dustin Humm
We have a Postfix(2.1.5)/Amavis-new(20030616)/SpamAssassin(3.0.2) setup on RH9. Our setup works very well with one exception: We get this (or something like it) in the maillog on a regular basis: Jul 30 06:35:28 spamhost amavis[1516]: (01516-18) cached fa63a14bcc69e31f69e554579f645969 from <[EMA