> MTA will need to map these privileged accounts to a content filter
> port number, so that you could assign appropriate policy bank to it.
> The simplest would be to provide a separate smtpd postfix service
> for them (with its own -o content_filter setting), accessible
> only to these authorized
¿Nobody has idea?
Well, I've done my own search...
Maybe a good option is to stop .EXE recieved files in SMTP level
(mime_header_checks if you use Postfix as I do) and permit to send .EXE
from your own accounts at filter level (Amavisd-new, using bypass_banned
policy).
You'll get what I'm loo
Hi all,
¿Is it possible to make a policy bank which permit the domain users to
send .exe-like file but doesn't receive them?
Afer all my last goal is make not permit the .exe-like file traffic in
any direction (inbound/outbound) by default but permit the outbound in
only few accounts. ¿Can I d
e is
very receptive to any feedback. I use it daily and I'm very happy with it.
[1] http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping throu
s_destiny D_BOUNCE into a D_DISCARD for this message.
;)
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and confi
status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok,
id=05782-04, DISCARD(bounce.suppressed))
Aug 31 18:48:47 mail postfix/qmgr[5245]: 51171D50064: removed
... but I don't recieve any failed delivery notification.
¿What's wrong?
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
of content.
¿?
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Dow
?
Maybe it's a Postfix (the SMTP I use currenlty) issue, but I don't know.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now
> I had better luck by doing this (for example):
>
> %banned_rules = (
> 'BLOCK_EXE' => new_RE(
> # block double extensions in names:
>qr'\.[^./]*\.(exe|vbs|pif|scr|bat|cmd|com|cpl|dll)\.?$'i,
> # blocks MS executable file(1) types:
>qr'^\.(exe|exe-ms)$',
> # block these MIME types
>
y.
At log_level 5 I get exactly the same message aqs you.
:S
Maybe Mark will answer it...
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find p
HI all,
My goal is that my users (who are authenticated by SASL) can't send any
.exe attached file. So, in my amavis.conf config file I've got the next
code:
$policy_bank{'SASLBYPASS'} = { # mail from submission and smtps ports
bypass_spam_checks_maps => [1], # don't spam-check this mai
> I'm not talking about your server. I'm talking about the client. The
> first message was sent from a client on a network considered dynamic.
> You show this was sent via SASL auth. The second message was sent from
> a client on a network considered static. I don't know if this is your
> network o
AIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, delay=2.6,
delays=0.59/0/0.01/2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as
E77BBD5028E)
Aug 8 16:29:58 mail postfix/qmgr[12043]: 7644DD5028D: removed
I've solved the problem an I understan the real trouble was something
relation
tp[11398]: 62D01D5028B:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[64.233.183.2
7]:25, delay=4.2, delays=0.57/0.01/0.41/3.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250
2.0.0 OK 1186574641 i7si2751199nfh)
Aug 8 14:04:01 mail postfix/qmgr[11386]: 62D01D5028B: removed
It's clear that the rea
I've printed your mail to read it with maximum attention. Currenlty I'm
learning and testing every point that you comment.
Very very great info Richard.
1001 thanks.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still gr
Hi,
My amavisd-new+spamasssassin runs well. At present, when SPAM mail is
detected by SA, it is sended to my $MYHOME/$QUARANTINEDIR
(/var/amavis/quarantine in my system). Currenly I use Postix with
virtuals domains/users (with MySQL backend) and Dovecot as POP/IMAP server.
The mailboxes dir (us
Hi all,
I'm setting up a CentOS box with the next mailserver combination:
Postfix+Amavisd-new+ClamAV+Spamassassin
An encrypted communications are a requisite, so I've already configured
IMAP+SSL (port 993) and SMTP+SSL (port 465).
The system works well if I've amavisd-new deactived:
Jul 28 13:
17 matches
Mail list logo