Gary V (mr88talent) writes:
> I added that as patch 6. Patch 5 is the Perl 5.8.9 taint bug (which is
> only required if one is using Perl 5.8.9.
>
> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd.2.6.2.patch1.txt
> http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd.2.6.2.patch2.txt
> http://www200.pair.com/me
Mark Martinec (Mark.Martinec+amavis) writes:
> >
> > This is available at http://mirrors.catpipe.net/amavisd-new/hgweb/
>
> Thanks, I have now added a link to this repository
> from the amavisd web page, section 'All versions'.
> (forgot to do it last time, sorry)
Great!
> > Mark, what d
Thomas Mueller (thomas) writes:
> > Gary, Mark,
> >
> > As you may be aware I maintain an HG (Mercurial) repository of all
> > versions of Amavis since the original Amavis-perl versions.
> >
> > This is available at http://mirrors.catpipe.net/amavisd-new/hgweb/
> >
>
> my vote f
Mark Martinec (Mark.Martinec+amavis) writes:
> Gary,
>
> > Mark, I now have collected:
>
> > http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd.2.6.2.patch1.txt
> > http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd.2.6.2.patch2.txt
> > http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd.2.6.2.patch3.txt
> > http://www20
Hi everyone,
I've spent a bit of Christmas time on a little hobby project, which
was to import all historical versions of amavis/amavis-perl and amavisd-new
into a VCS (Version Control System).
http://mirrors.catpipe.net/amavisd-new/hgweb/amavis/
I'll be importing all new releases, prere
Baertl, Martin (M.Baertl) writes:
> Hi all,
>
> We will install a second mail gateway in the next weeks and i just wanted to
> know if it is possible to just run 1 mysql server and both
> amavis/spamassassin server connect to the same database and use the same
> data?
Yes, no problem.
Mark Martinec (Mark.Martinec+amavis) writes:
> > so :-) ), I'm more on the linux side. But what I think linux (and
> > probably FreeBSD too) would do in case of the temporary files
> > amavisd-new creates is that those files are never written out to
> > disk due to their short lifetime but instead
Mark Martinec (Mark.Martinec+amavis) writes:
> Phil,
>
> > You can short-circuit this mail and tell me if this is a known bug and I
> > need to upgrade
>
> I checked the release notes and I don't think the 2.3.3 bring any bug fixes
> in the area where your problem lurks. It offers somewhat more i
Mark Martinec (Mark.Martinec+amavis) writes:
>
> Sorry, no ideas. Looks strange, but I'm unable to offer explanation.
> You might want to insert some additional logging in sub lookup_sql,
> in particular in the loop:
> while ( defined($a_ref=$conn_h->fetchrow_arrayref($sel)) ) {
> See if perhaps
You can short-circuit this mail and tell me if this is a known bug and I
need to upgrade
:)
(wish there was a CVS repo for amavisd-new, so I could look this
up myself *sigh*).
Environment:
FreeBSD 4.9 i386
amavisd-new-2.2.0
Perl 5.8.5
PostgreSQL 7.3.2
PROBLEM
---
Anyway, on a particular ins
Dave Augustus (davea) writes:
> Because MS Exchange strips headers, the email that a user would consider
> as spam is now modified. If I set up an email account that they would
> then forward their spam TO, would that train BAYES properly?
No... That's the whole problem.
DSPAM "s
Adam Kennedy (akennedy) writes:
>
> Would Amavis benefit from a dual proc setup under Linux 2.6? I'm getting
> ready to upgrade some servers, and I was wondering if anyone has seen
> any improvement with using dual proc over single proc.
Definitely, IF you have the RAM to go with it.
-
Another example of uvscan not being up to the job.
On a 20050217 box, we get TONS of viruses like "email-details.doc .scr"
files packed in .zips making it through.
It would always say "clean", even with recent dat files...
Clamav would catch it everytime:
Blocked INFECTED (Worm.Mytob.
Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt) writes:
> * Phil Regnauld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > Set up clamav as the first one, and uvscan as a secondary one...
> >
> > Since both AVs are run, in any case, you don't win anything.
>
> In case of an ou
Ricardo Stella (stella) writes:
>
> The main thing is to keep uvscan up to date.
>
> Current version of the engine is v4.4.00. Notice that dat files are now
> updated daily, but in any case, I would suggest to use the beta dats,
> which now are updated hourly.
I had never noticed the
Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt) writes:
>
> Why not run the two side-by-side and then show that clamd kicks
> uvscan's ass?
I can confirm that. uvscan is letting several viruses through
every day, clamd seems to catch most (this is on a setup with
3 AVs: Trend, McAfee
System: SuSE SLES 8 x86, Perl 5.8.3, amavisd-20020517 (I know...)
Hi people,
I don't expect a lot of support for such an old version of Amavis,
but we're in the process of migrating to a new version. In the
meantime, we're getting this failure in the maillog:
amavis[536]: (00536-20) Decoding of
17 matches
Mail list logo
