yes amavisd-milter I use it but when I try to configure SMTP_AUTH policy
bank it produces no effect
thanks
Rick
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
> That policy bank is set by amavisd-milter. Are you using that?
>
> On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:03 AM, RJ45 wrote:
>> now MYNETS po
now MYNETS policy bank works with sendmail and amavisd-new
but how to use policy bank SMTP_AUTH ?
from hte logs I see it is complitely ignored
thanks
Rick
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Rick,
>
>> the problem is that I would like internal clients to be into a bypass
>> policy ba
Thnks to all.
I use amavisd-milter but I do not use AM.PDP-SOCK since I do not know why
it is not working... it works only with AM.CL
What is hte difference between these policy bank ?
tryed to add a SMTP_AUTH policy bank and now I will see how it works.
thanks to all
Rick
On Wed, 13 Feb 2
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, MrC wrote:
>
> Setup submission service in postfix, and have its content_filter port 10026
> (for example):
>
> ...
> -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10026
>
> and in amavisd.conf, create a policy bank and listener port:
>
thanks,
but I meant is there a way to d
Hello,
I am using amavisd-new 2.5.3 on RHEL5
the problem is that I would like internal clients to be into a bypass
policy bank so that virus checks are bypassed.
I tryed with default MYNETS policy bank.
This does not work because I am using sendmail (And I need sendmail not
postfix) and sendmai
gt; 0, # don't remove NOTIFY=SUCCESS
option
};
I do not have any DKIM mail server wither I do not have
amavisd-new listening on port 10027
is this Stanza ignored ?
Also lookign at documentation I did not understand how to
implement a white list for mail originating inside my network
thanks
Ri
Hello,
I set amavisd-new version 2.5.2 to warn users who receive mails.
viruses are detected and mails goes into quarantine /var/virusmails.
the problem is that users are never warned they received a virus message
and that message was quarantined.
this because the mail originating from [EMAIL PR
