On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 15:29 -0700, Yassen Damyanov wrote:
> --- On 9/11/10, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
> > 'no'. because amavisd-new only runs ONCE per email
> > (multi-recipient
> > emails only run ONCE through SA/bayes)
>
> Thanks, Michael. I know that and still I don't see a controversy. I ca
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 14:58 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
> Vernon,
>
> > I have a few emails with attachments that have been quarantined as spam.
> > I would normally use altermime to strip the attachment and then sa-learn
> > --ham. Is this still the recommended way of unlearning messsages with
>
I have a few emails with attachments that have been quarantined as spam.
I would normally use altermime to strip the attachment and then sa-learn
--ham. Is this still the recommended way of unlearning messsages with
attachments?
Vernon
---
Thomas Althoff wrote:
>> Apparently Microsoft has disabled IMAP access to the Public Folders in
>>
> exchange 2007.
>
> Not true.
>
>
> "Public Folder Access
>
> In the RTM version of Exchange 2007, the following client applications
> can access public folders:
>
> * Microsoft Office Out
Apparently Microsoft has disabled IMAP access to the Public Folders in
exchange 2007. Does anyone have a way of moving MISSED spam messages
from a public folder under exchange 2007.
Any thoughts or experience would help.
Thanks,
Vernon
Gary V wrote:
Vernon wrote:
Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on
several server due system load. I use gentoo on most ser
Bill Landry wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Vernon A. Fort"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on
several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers,
standard setup...
postfix+amavisd-new+c
While on the bitdefender topic, I've had to disable this scanner on
several server due system load. I use gentoo on most servers, standard
setup...
postfix+amavisd-new+clamav+spamassassin
I tipically use 2-3 scanners on each server but the CPU load with
bitdefender appears very high - usu
