Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Gary V
Dustin wrote: > Guys, > Thanx for the comments... > I think the light is starting to dimly glow above my head! However, if > I add these IP hosts to $mynetworks, wouldn't I then need to create some > type of access map that explicitly denies any sender addresses from the > domains we protect. I

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
ence... Dustin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:54 PM To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule... Dustin wrote: > This would be true if our server was direc

Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Gary V
Dustin wrote: > This would be true if our server was directly attached to or hosted all > the mailboxes for the protected domains...we, however, are only using > this solution as a gateway for incoming mail for all the domains we > protect...which postfix then forwards (after filtering, etc.) to t

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Noel Jones
At 12:23 PM 3/16/2006, Dustin Humm wrote: This would be true if our server was directly attached to or hosted all the mailboxes for the protected domains...we, however, are only using this solution as a gateway for incoming mail for all the domains we protect...which postfix then forwards (afte

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule... At 06:51 PM 3/15/2006, Dustin Humm wrote: >We protect roughly 25 domains with >postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of >these domains need to be able to talk to one another. >Although we are >using this system for incom

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Noel Jones
At 06:51 PM 3/15/2006, Dustin Humm wrote: We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of these domains need to be able to talk to one another. Although we are using this system for incoming mail only, we, obviously, need to allow communication between the domains that

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-16 Thread Dustin Humm
t: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:30 AM To: Dustin Humm Cc: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule... Hi Dustin, Dustin Humm wrote: > We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of > these domains need to be able to talk to one anothe

Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi Dustin, Dustin Humm wrote: > We protect roughly 25 domains with postfix/amavis/spamassassin. All of > these domains need to be able to talk to one another. Although we are > using this system for incoming mail only, we, obviously, need to allow > communication between the domains that we prote

RE: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Dustin Humm
ay off base, just say so! If you have any alternate great ideas, please share!! Thanx again for your assistance... Dustin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 12:33 PM To: amavis-user@lists.sourcefo

Re: [AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Gary V
Dustin wrote: > I need to create a rule that evaluates both the To: & From: addresses > (domains) in an e-mail. I want to mark/tag/block/whatever e-mails that > have the same originating & destination domains (i.e. the sender is > spoofing the recipient domain). Then your users cannot send mail

[AMaViS-user] Advanced Rule...

2006-03-15 Thread Dustin Humm
I need to create a rule that evaluates both the To: & From: addresses (domains) in an e-mail. I want to mark/tag/block/whatever e-mails that have the same originating & destination domains (i.e. the sender is spoofing the recipient domain). I have played around with some meta rules in SpamAssassi