Re: [AMaViS-user] Bad header result overrides SA?

2007-03-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Mark Tiramani, > *If SA returns a score above the kill level, and afterwards Amavisd-new > finds a bad header, does a positive BH result supersede the SA score? (No). > Are both sets of headers added? (Yes). > Is the message quarantined as "badh-*" or as "spam-"? (As "spam-") Right. > I am guess

Re: [AMaViS-user] Bad header result overrides SA?

2007-03-09 Thread markjt
On 9 Mar 2007 at 21:19, Mark Martinec wrote: > Header checks, even if triggered, do not prevent spam checks from running. Thanks, I do understand that. I think my question may have been unclear. I was not saying that BH prevents any spam checks from running (see below*). As luck would have it,

Re: [AMaViS-user] Bad header result overrides SA?

2007-03-09 Thread Mark Martinec
Mark Tiramani, > Am I correct in thinking that if I completely disable bad header checks > then Amavisd-new should be able to use the SA score as it does for spam > that does not have header issues? Header checks, even if triggered, do not prevent spam checks from running. > The reason for the q

[AMaViS-user] Bad header result overrides SA?

2007-03-08 Thread markjt
I think I may have misunderstood the way Amavisd-new processes emails in combination with SpamAssassin. Can anyone confirm the following please: Am I correct in thinking that if I completely disable bad header checks then Amavisd-new should be able to use the SA score as it does for spam that