Hello all,
ok, new Debian package is available and installed on my machine.
The error message
> fail (message has been altered)
mentioned in the start post of this thread is gone now. :-)
Regards,
Martin
--
Apps buil
Mark Martinec wrote:
> No, it's just his style of numbering versions.
> The 0.33_6 will become 0.34 when released,
> just as 0.32_6 now became a 0.33.
>
> The 0.33_6 is dropping support for pre-standard DKIM.
Yes, I see that now. I forced a cpan database update and was able to
install 0.33.
Th
> Hmmm, is Jason possibly still working on the 0.33 release? From the
> link you posted above:
>
>Mail-DKIM-0.33.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 07:57 74K
>Mail-DKIM-0.33_5.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 08:07 74K
>Mail-DKIM-0.33_6.tar.gz 10-Mar-2009 08:22 74K
No, it's just his style of numbering vers
Hello Mark!
> Martin Sebald wrote:
>> Ah great!
>> I'll try to motivate the package maintainer to upgrade to 0.33. ;-)
> Thank you guys!
My bug report / release wish was closed this evening and a new Debian
package with version 0.33 was announced and is about to be uploaded to the
archive.
It sh
On 3/10/2009 3:26 PM, Bill Landry wrote:
> Patrick Wong wrote:
>> Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
>> did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
> Not for me. Just now tried again:
>
> cpan[1]> install Mail::DKIM
> CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.18)
> Going
Patrick Wong wrote:
> Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
> did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
Not for me. Just now tried again:
cpan[1]> install Mail::DKIM
CPAN: Storable loaded ok (v2.18)
Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated
Yes Bill, I can confirm that 0.33 is available from CPAN cause I just
did it this morning after reading Mark's notes.
Mark Martinec wrote:
>> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
>> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>>
>> From release n
Mark Martinec wrote:
>> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
>> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>>
>> From release notes:
>>(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
>>your DKIM public keys, you may ne
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:19:55 +0100 Martin Sebald
wrote:
>Hello Mark!
>
>>> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
>>> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>>> From release notes:
>>>(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is corr
> > So port and package maintainers should no longer have an excuse
> > not to upgrade their port/package to the current official release
> > of Mail-DKIM-0.33.
> > See: http://cpan.perl.org/authors/id/J/JA/JASLONG/
Michael Scheidell wrote:
> PR Added for freebsd.
> If you need patches for freebs
>> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
>> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>>
>> From release notes:
>>(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
>>your DKIM public keys, you may need to upgrade Perl m
Hello Mark!
>> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
>> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>> From release notes:
>>(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
>>your DKIM public keys, you may need to upgra
> Not that I know of, but there is a bug in Mail::DKIM 0.32 or earlier,
> only triggered in marginal cases - yours may be one of them.
>
> From release notes:
>(btw, if testkeys fails and you believe your DNS is correctly serving
>your DKIM public keys, you may need to upgrade Perl module M
Martin,
> I noticed that a test mail to autorespond+d...@dk.elandsys.com brings back
>
> a positive result:
> > DKIM Signature validation: pass
> > DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices: "dkim=unknown"
>
> Is there a bug in the testkeys feature of amavis?
Not that I know of, but there is a bug in
Hello all,
I noticed that a test mail to autorespond+d...@dk.elandsys.com brings back
a positive result:
> DKIM Signature validation: pass
> DKIM Author Domain Signing Practices: "dkim=unknown"
Is there a bug in the testkeys feature of amavis?
Kindest regards,
Martin
-
Hello all,
I tested my keys and this came up:
> TESTING#126: mail200903._domainkey.grillen-darf-nicht-gesund-sein.de => fail
> (message has been altered)
All other domains passed the test. I use the same configuration and
domainkey for all domains. Also the BIND zone files are identical.
A oth
16 matches
Mail list logo
