Benu,
> I made an attempt to apply this change to amavisd-2.4.2 at 12050, amavisd
> now reports:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# service amavisd stop
> Shutting down amavisd: Problem in the In::SMTP code: Unrecognized character
> \xC2 at (eval 44) line 695. [FAILED]
>
> Where did I go wrong?
Somehow
On Sunday 30 July 2006 17:01, Mark Martinec wrote:
> --- amavisd.origTue Jun 27 13:31:56 2006
> +++ amavisd Sun Jul 30 23:41:13 2006
> @@ -12050,13 +12050,18 @@
[snip]
I made an attempt to apply this change to amavisd-2.4.2 at 12050, amavisd now
reports:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# serv
Small enough patch that I personally don't think it needs an amavisd-update.
Gábor? If I have the time today, I'll add a pr for a ports patch for it and cc
you.
I have also looked at SA 3.1.4 and want to wait on that till SARE make some
updates to their rules
(old rules causing LINT errors)
--
Michael,
(I already replied offline, but let's keep the list informed)
> After upgrading to 2.4.2, getting backscatter I never got before:
> It looks like amavisd-new is trying to bounce email (spam) back to me
> even though it exceeds dsn cutoff level.
Gary V wrote:
> Looks like a bug.
> No pro
>
> If he does not respond soon, he is probably of the office.
How dare he take a day off :-)
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1
This bug is also present in 2.4.1. When using lmtp
with 2.3.3, it appears there was code to mute the DSN:
Jul 5 10:19:39 sfm postfix/lmtp[3276]: E49A716D23:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1],
delay=20, status=sent (250 2.5.0 Ok [EMAIL PROTECTED],
DSN muted (550 5.7.1 Messag
Michael wrote:
> I will change to the smtp service for now, and I know now that Mark has
> pointers from you (lmtp service is not obeying spam_final_destination)
> it won't be long before he fixes it.
If he does not respond soon, he is probably of the office.
> Noop, only patch to amavisd-new fo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:27 PM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Getting new backscatter with 2.4.2
>
>
> Gary wrot
>lmtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 lmtp
> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/remove_headers
>smtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 smtp
> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/remove_headers
Note that header_checks are performed by the postfix
cleanup service
Gary wrote:
> I used your entries in master.cf and I could reproduce this.
> lmtp-amavis unix - - n - 2 lmtp
> -o lmtp_data_done_timeout=1200
> -o lmtp_send_xforward_command=yes
> -o disable_dns_lookups=yes
> -o header_checks=regexp:/etc/postfix/remove_header
Gary wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>> And, ONLY sites with 2.4.2 are doing this:
>> grep -c '1 Rejected' /var/log/maillog
>> 99.99% of the 'Blocked SPAM' is also logging '554 5.7.1 Rejected' and
>> bouncing.
I used your entries in master.cf and I could reproduce this.
lmtp-amavis unix - -
Michael wrote:
> And, ONLY sites with 2.4.2 are doing this:
> grep -c '1 Rejected' /var/log/maillog
> 99.99% of the 'Blocked SPAM' is also logging '554 5.7.1 Rejected' and
> bouncing.
> On sites without 2.4.2:
> Even zgrep -c '1 Rejected' /var/log/maillog* doesn't show anything.
> (maybe one or
And, ONLY sites with 2.4.2 are doing this:
grep -c '1 Rejected' /var/log/maillog
99.99% of the 'Blocked SPAM' is also logging '554 5.7.1 Rejected' and
bouncing.
On sites without 2.4.2:
Even zgrep -c '1 Rejected' /var/log/maillog* doesn't show anything.
(maybe one or two over the last month)
Pos
Gary wrote:
>> Mailq empty
> This is curious. I would think if spam was getting rejected, at least
> some of the DSNs would not be deliverable. Have you maybe set
> bounce_queue_lifetime 0 ?
> If so, that would explain.
Or maybe it's just that the buck is passed to another server.
Gary V
Usin
Michael wrote:
> And just to be complete:
> Postfix is version 2.2.8
> master.cf has these changes:
> smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
>-o receive_override_options=no_address_mappings
> lmtp-amavis unix - - n - 4 lmtp
> -o lmtp_data_don
Michael wrote:
try
grep -r D_REJECT /etc
Maybe amavisd-new is reading a different file.
> I did mention that "it worked fine"(tm) with 2.3.3 ...
Yep.
>> If amavisd-new bounces it, the DSN will be from amavisd-new (although
>> there should not be one in this case), if D_REJECT is used, your MTA
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary V
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:40 PM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Getting new backscatter with 2.4.2
> This looks like D_REJEC
Michael wrote:
> After upgrading to 2.4.2, getting backscatter I never got before:
> It looks like amavisd-new is trying to bounce email (spam) back to me
> even though it exceeds dsn cutoff level.
> Spammer uses From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Amavisd-new bounces it (score of 49+
After upgrading to 2.4.2, getting backscatter I never got before:
It looks like amavisd-new is trying to bounce email (spam) back to me
even though it exceeds dsn cutoff level.
Spammer uses From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amavisd-new bounces it (score of 49+)
Even though I think I ha
19 matches
Mail list logo
