Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread mouss
Al Bogner a écrit : >> >>No, it is a bounce message. Decoded message text follows: >> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Message delivery failed to the following address >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Reason: Mailbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> deactivated > > > How did you decode it? > man uudecode.

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Les Ault
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 23:39 +0100, Al Bogner wrote: > How did you decode it? > > Al The body of the message is uuencoded in two parts. The first part is ATT163765.htm and is composed of the 6 lines starting with "begin 666 ATT163765.htm" to the first "end". I copied those lines to a file called

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Al Bogner
Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 22:52 schrieb Les Ault: > On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 20:55 +0100, Al Bogner wrote: > > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: > > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt > > > > Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? > > > > Al > >

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Gary V
Al wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 21:37 schrieb Henrik Krohns: >> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Al Bogner wrote: >> > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: >> > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt >> > >> > Can anyone confirm, that th

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Al Bogner
Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 21:37 schrieb Henrik Krohns: > Use these.. > http://www.virustotal.com/ I compared now with my versions, and found that my versions were a few updates newer than those of virustotal, when I scanned the file. AntiVir / Linux Version 2.1.5-38 +gui product version: 2

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Al Bogner
Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 21:37 schrieb Henrik Krohns: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Al Bogner wrote: > > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: > > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt > > > > Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? > >

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Henrik Krohns
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:55:42PM +0100, Al Bogner wrote: > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt > > Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? > > Al Use these.. http://virusscan.jotti.org/ http://www.virustot

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (01.02.2006/21:48 Uhr) schrieb Al Bogner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), > Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 20:55 schrieb Al Bogner: >> I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: >> http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt >> >> Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus?

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Gary V
Al wrote: > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt > Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? > Al To find out, submit it to: http://virusscan.jotti.org/ and http://www.virustotal.com/ Gary V ---

Re: [AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Al Bogner
Am Mittwoch, 1. Februar 2006 20:55 schrieb Al Bogner: > I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: > http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt > > Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? Who wrote this line: X-VirusBlockAttach: dangerous extention found, code I

[AMaViS-user] OT: Is this a virusmail?

2006-02-01 Thread Al Bogner
I got this mail today, which was not recognized by 4 virus-scanners: http://members.inode.at/pinguin/possiblevirus.txt Can anyone confirm, that this is a virus? Al --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log fil