Re: [AMaViS-user] SA rules summary for ham not logged?

2007-12-07 Thread Mark Martinec
Dave, > I'm not talking about the addition of > headers to messages, I'm talking about the logging (to syslog, > in my case) of each message as amavisd processes it. The list of SpamAssassin test names which triggered is available in macro %T, which can be added to a logging template (or to notif

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA rules summary for ham not logged?

2007-12-06 Thread MrC
Dave McGuire wrote: > On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:39 PM, MrC wrote: >>>Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the >>> SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged >>> as spam. I can't believe I've never noticed this before, but >>> sitting here staring

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA rules summary for ham not logged?

2007-12-06 Thread Dave McGuire
On Dec 6, 2007, at 12:39 PM, MrC wrote: >>Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the >> SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged >> as spam. I can't believe I've never noticed this before, but >> sitting here staring at a log file, this seems

Re: [AMaViS-user] SA rules summary for ham not logged?

2007-12-06 Thread MrC
Dave McGuire wrote: >Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the > SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged as > spam. I can't believe I've never noticed this before, but sitting > here staring at a log file, this seems to be the case. > Lower th

[AMaViS-user] SA rules summary for ham not logged?

2007-12-06 Thread Dave McGuire
Hey folks. It looks to me like amavisd-new isn't logging the SpamAssassin rules summary for messages that *don't* get tagged as spam. I can't believe I've never noticed this before, but sitting here staring at a log file, this seems to be the case. Basically I have a spam message th