Re: [AMaViS-user] SMTP AUTH not subjected to unnecessary check?

2010-04-06 Thread Voytek Eymont
On Wed, March 17, 2010 3:14 am, Mark Martinec wrote: > Advice (mouss and others) feed authenticated mail to amavisd on a > dedicated port is good, regardless of whether you need this separation > right away, or later. > (from mouss): > -o content_filter=smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10586 Mark, Gary

Re: [AMaViS-user] SMTP AUTH not subjected to unnecessary check?

2010-03-16 Thread Mark Martinec
Voytek, > I have Postfix with SMTP AUTH with amavisd, it all works well (as long as > I don't touch it..) > > (cross posted to postfix list as well) Advice (mouss and others) feed authenticated mail to amavisd on a dedicated port is good, regardless of whether you need this separation right away

[AMaViS-user] SMTP AUTH not subjected to unnecessary check?

2010-03-03 Thread Voytek Eymont
I have Postfix with SMTP AUTH with amavisd, it all works well (as long as I don't touch it..) (cross posted to postfix list as well) I have now "allowed" some users to use SMTP AUTH, but, some of their mail then gets evaluated as 'spam' by amavisd/spamassasin scores, amongst these, 'dynamic ip' t