Heute (29.12.2006/17:34 Uhr) schrieb Gary V,
> mouss wrote:
>> Ed Lucero wrote:
>>> How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
>>>
>>> I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
>>> spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
>>> ad
mouss wrote:
> Ed Lucero wrote:
>> How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
>>
>> I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
>> spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
>> address when it gets sent, so the receiving MTA can plac
Ed Lucero wrote:
> How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
>
> I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
> spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
> address when it gets sent, so the receiving MTA can place it in the
> correct
How can I send spam to a dedicated spam respository server.
I know I can send all spam to a single address by setting
spam_quarantine_to to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I want to maintain the recipient
address when it gets sent, so the receiving MTA can place it in the
correct domain, user mailbox.
Than
Thomas,
> Which is a way more complex setup as intended. I solved the problem
> by adding this small piece of code to the do_spam() function:
>
> # Remove existing spam headers. Borrowed from
> add_forwarding_header_edits_common() my(@which_headers) = qw(
> X-Spam-Status X-Spam-Level X-Spam-Flag
Mark,
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:01, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > Is there another way for forwarding all spam emails
> > including only one set of X-Spam-* headers?
>
> Yes. For the purpose of delivering spam to a mailbox
> accessible to users without a need of further processing
> at the time of rel
Thomas,
> Is there another way for forwarding all spam emails
> including only one set of X-Spam-* headers?
Yes. For the purpose of delivering spam to a mailbox
accessible to users without a need of further processing
at the time of release, one can turn on appending
address extensions (line +spa
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:21, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > > Perhaps you are examining quarantined mail, not a forwarded mail?
> >
> > True, I looked at a quarantined mail. Thought an "smtp" quarantine was
> > the natural way to forward all spam emails to a single destination, isn't
> > it?
>
> Quaran
Thomas,
> > Perhaps you are examining quarantined mail, not a forwarded mail?
>
> True, I looked at a quarantined mail. Thought an "smtp" quarantine was the
> natural way to forward all spam emails to a single destination, isn't it?
Quarantined messages tries to preserve mail close to the origina
On Monday 27 June 2005 21:56, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > when forwarding all spam mails to a single destination,
> > existing X-Spam-* headers don't get deleted.
>
> Hm, are sure? With a Postfix (dual-MTA) setup?
> I'm not seeing it here.
>
> > Here's why: check_mail() calls do_spam() before the firs
Thomas,
> when forwarding all spam mails to a single destination,
> existing X-Spam-* headers don't get deleted.
Hm, are sure? With a Postfix (dual-MTA) setup?
I'm not seeing it here.
> Here's why: check_mail() calls do_spam() before the first
> add_forwarding_header_edits_common() call is done.
Hello Mark,
when forwarding all spam mails to a single destination,
existing X-Spam-* headers don't get deleted.
Here's why: check_mail() calls do_spam() before the first
add_forwarding_header_edits_common() call is done.
Is this by design?
Cheers,
Thomas
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
