On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:38:08PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> Just an update to everyone.
>
> I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider.
>
> Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of those,
> 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined.
>
> So my question bel
Our stats (last 24 hrs - average)
server1:
Passed 13499 (below 3.5)
Passed SPAM 4465 (below 6.9)
Banned 5
Infected 568
SPAM 23541
Server 2 is approx. the same numbers
Both boxes are Pentium 4 2.0 GHZ with 2 GB RAM and 2x80 GB IDE drives.
We use sendmail-dual setup, spamassassin (no razor), cl
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 02:11:37PM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:27:01PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We're running postfix right now on our mail server. Mail server always
> > has 97% CPU idle and we have 4 gb of RAM, to which most is usually free
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:27:01PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're running postfix right now on our mail server. Mail server always
> has 97% CPU idle and we have 4 gb of RAM, to which most is usually free.
>
> We deliver mail for about 5000 accounts, but our spam filtering is
Gary wrote:
> If you already own the hardware, here is a (possibly lame) thought
> (but the theory sounds good to me). Set up
> amavisd/spamassassin/razor/dcc/avprogram on both machines.
Now that I think about it, I think you could set Postfix up to
send a portion to one server, and the remainder
Matt wrote:
> All of your suggestions have been great. Thank you.
> My only concern is this
> If I were to setup another server, that server would be a single 3.06
> ghz machine with 1 GB RAM and IDE drives. The current server is dual
> 3.06 ghz 4 GB RAM with SCSI drives and RAID.
> So my
>> Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of
>> those, 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined.
>>
>> So my question below should wrap around that data. Will it be able
>> to process 123,728 messages per day, with antivirus/antispam and
>> local mail delivery?
>>
>> I ha
All of your suggestions have been great. Thank you.
My only concern is this
If I were to setup another server, that server would be a single 3.06
ghz machine with 1 GB RAM and IDE drives. The current server is dual
3.06 ghz 4 GB RAM with SCSI drives and RAID.
So my choice is either to ke
Zitat von Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just an update to everyone.
I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider.
Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of
those, 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined.
So my question below should wrap around that dat
Matt,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matt Juszczak
> Sent: Thursday, 21 July 2005 12:38 p.m.
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?
>
>
PM
> To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Will our machine handle it?
>
> Just an update to everyone.
>
> I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider.
>
> Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of those,
> 71,097 were bloc
Matt wrote:
> Just an update to everyone.
> I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider.
> Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of those,
> 71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined.
> So my question below should wrap around that data. Will it be able to
>
Just an update to everyone.
I just got the data from our outsourced spam provider.
Yesterday, the 19th, they processed 123,728 messages for us. Of those,
71,097 were blocked and 20,000 quarantined.
So my question below should wrap around that data. Will it be able to
process 123,728 message
Hi all,
We're running postfix right now on our mail server. Mail server always
has 97% CPU idle and we have 4 gb of RAM, to which most is usually free.
We deliver mail for about 5000 accounts, but our spam filtering is
currently outsourced to Postini. I don't know off the top of my head how
14 matches
Mail list logo
