On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Peter Olsson wrote:
> One of the big reasons for me is this: Why would you want to pass
> through
> the 90%+ amount of email that is spam?
> Why put this unnecessary load on internal systems and users?
96% of e-mail is rejected during SMTP. 1% of the e-mail is betw
> From: Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] how many people really use the quarantine?
>
> I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine messages?
We do systematically at our site. We quarantine both viruses (we don't
receive many)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> > Because 99% of the time, end-users are complete morons who couldn't
> > find their own butts with both hands, a funnel, and a roadmap. The
> > vast majority of them can't handle sor
Lennard Bakker wrote:
> For most users i don't want to tag there email because they don't
> understand filtering options of there email client. They just want to
> read there expected email with the default client config.
Yeah, we do the move to Junk folder as a global script for all users.
> So
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:42 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>> Because 99% of the time, end-users are complete morons who couldn't
>>> find their own butts with both hands, a funnel, and a roadmap. The
>>> vast majority of them can't handle sorting based on tagging criteria.
>>
>> This i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jo Rhett wrote:
| I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine messages?
|
| And why is this better than tagging the messages and sorting them
| into the Junk folder of the recipient?
|
| I'm honestly curious, because there is a metric
On Jan 29, 2008, at 6:42 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> Because 99% of the time, end-users are complete morons who
>> couldn't find their own butts with both hands, a funnel, and a
>> roadmap. The vast majority of them can't handle sorting based on
>> tagging criteria.
>
> This is why I am curious.
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> This is why I am curious. Trying to get users to log into a
> different system to check the quarantine has never yielded good
> results in my mind. Sorting it into a folder they can check on their
> mail client of choice always seems to work, they u
On 30.01.2008 01:42, Jo Rhett wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
>> Because 99% of the time, end-users are complete morons who couldn't
>> find their own butts with both hands, a funnel, and a roadmap. The
>> vast majority of them can't handle sorting based on tagging cr
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amavis-user-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Rhett
>
> I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine messages?
>
> And why is this better than tagging the messages and sorting them
> into the Junk folder of the rec
On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Because 99% of the time, end-users are complete morons who couldn't
> find their own butts with both hands, a funnel, and a roadmap. The
> vast majority of them can't handle sorting based on tagging criteria.
This is why I am curious. Trying
On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Stefan Palme wrote:
> No education from me - just my contribution to statistics: I am using
> quarantine only for VIRUS INFECTED mails (because some users still
> want to open an attachment even if the mail is wrapped by an "THIS IS
> A VIRUS MAIL" message).
> Spam is n
On Jan 29, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
> I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine
> messages?
I use it at three commercial sites, soon to be four, and am
responsible for its deployment on about ten others.
> And why is this better than tagging the messages and so
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:13:33 +0100
> Von: Stefan Palme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Amavis Users
> Betreff: Re: [AMaViS-user] how many people really use the quarantine?
> > I'm curious, how many people really use a
> I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine messages?
>
> And why is this better than tagging the messages and sorting them
> into the Junk folder of the recipient?
>
> I'm honestly curious, because there is a metric ton of code involved
> in the quarantine process, and I'
I'm curious, how many people really use amavisd to quarantine messages?
And why is this better than tagging the messages and sorting them
into the Junk folder of the recipient?
I'm honestly curious, because there is a metric ton of code involved
in the quarantine process, and I'm really not s
16 matches
Mail list logo
