Re: [AMaViS-user] mailq's lagging behind

2005-08-26 Thread Mark Martinec
Matt, > Our mailq's are lagging behind a bit and mail is taking a bit of time to > get to its destination. Our LDAP servers handle the queries fine. Our > process limit was 15, but I've amped this up to 20. Was this a good try > to fix the problem? Maybe we need to get a third relay server in?

Re: [AMaViS-user] mailq's lagging behind

2005-08-24 Thread Mark Martinec
Matt, > Our mailq's are lagging behind a bit and mail is taking a bit of time to > get to its destination. Our LDAP servers handle the queries fine. Our > process limit was 15, but I've amped this up to 20. Was this a good try > to fix the problem? Maybe we need to get a third relay server in?

RE: [AMaViS-user] mailq's lagging behind

2005-08-23 Thread Michael Scheidell
Download (with ldap) a list of current valid email addresses, 'portmap' them. Add a pointer to the db in postfix's main.cf to handle MOST of the email addresses, only do ldap queries on email addresses that don't exist in the postmap'ed relay db. For dictionary attacks, drop the connection after

Re: [AMaViS-user] mailq's lagging behind

2005-08-23 Thread Matt Juszczak
Nevermind :) it kinda bogged down the server with 20. Any other ideas? On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Matt Juszczak wrote: Hi all, Our mailq's are lagging behind a bit and mail is taking a bit of time to get to its destination. Our LDAP servers handle the queries fine. Our process limit was 15, but

[AMaViS-user] mailq's lagging behind

2005-08-23 Thread Matt Juszczak
Hi all, Our mailq's are lagging behind a bit and mail is taking a bit of time to get to its destination. Our LDAP servers handle the queries fine. Our process limit was 15, but I've amped this up to 20. Was this a good try to fix the problem? Maybe we need to get a third relay server in?