Mark Martinec wrote the following on 3/21/2007 12:51 PM -0800:
> Bill,
>
>
>> I like the artificial header idea. If you could at least make it an
>> optional flag that would be great. Would be nice to be able to add a
>> few SA points if ClamAV detects phish, image, scam, etc., messages,
>> ot
Bill,
> I like the artificial header idea. If you could at least make it an
> optional flag that would be great. Would be nice to be able to add a
> few SA points if ClamAV detects phish, image, scam, etc., messages,
> otherwise it doesn't make much sense to use the additional ClamAV
> signature
Mark Martinec wrote the following on 3/21/2007 6:51 AM -0800:
> Bob,
>
>
>> ah, does SA get any indication that clamav thinks the email is a phish?
>>
>
> No, currectly not. An artificial header field could be inserted I guess,
> but for the moment I don't think it is really needed, these p
Bob,
> ah, does SA get any indication that clamav thinks the email is a phish?
No, currectly not. An artificial header field could be inserted I guess,
but for the moment I don't think it is really needed, these phishing
scams collect enough spam points by themselves.
> Otherwise I guess turning
>>great, this was my biggest annoyance with clam's phishing detection,
>>does the email make it to bayes though?
>
>
> Yes it does. SA checks are invoked normally, and virus flag is turned off.
ah, does SA get any indication that clamav thinks the email is a phish?
Otherwise I guess turning off
Robert,
> > - phishing fraud as returned by ClamAV is now treated as spam, no
> > longer as a virus;
>
> great, this was my biggest annoyance with clam's phishing detection,
> does the email make it to bayes though?
Yes it does. SA checks are invoked normally, and virus flag is turned off.
Hi,
from the release notes...
> - phishing fraud as returned by ClamAV is now treated as spam, no
> longer as a virus;
great, this was my biggest annoyance with clam's phishing detection,
does the email make it to bayes though?
Regards,
Rob
---
