Gary,
> >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
> >> chatty. You have to request this one explicitly:
> >> $sa_spam_report_header=1;
> >
> > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
> I could not get that to work on my system either
> Set this in your amavisd.conf; you'ill see ALL it:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
that won't do it
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle P
boricua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > >>
| > >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
chatty.
| > >> You have to request this one explicitly: $sa_spam_report_header=1;
| >
| > > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
| > I would
> >>
> >> X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite
> >> chatty.
> >> You have to request this one explicitly: $sa_spam_report_header=1;
>
> > i tried that still no x-spam-report i wonder if postfix need to reload?
> I would get rid of the headers that the other serv
boricua wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:28:40 +0200
> Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> boricua,
>>
>> > i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
>>
>> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
>> > MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
>> > X-Spam-Level:
>>
On Sun, 7 Aug 2005 23:28:40 +0200
Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> boricua,
>
> > i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
>
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
> > MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
> > X-Spam-Level:
>
> X-Spam-Report is normally
boricua,
> i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.93 required=6.31 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, AWL,
> MISSING_SUBJECT, NO_REAL_NAME
> X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Report is normally not provided by default because is it quite chatty.
You have to request this one explicitly: $
boricua wrote:
> what is throwing me off is the x-spam status local they say yes but they go
> in inbox
That's what I assumed. The problem is, one of the other servers wrote
those headers, and then passed the message to you. They have one opinion of
what is considered spam, and your server has
boricua wrote:
>> I would also change:
>> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0;
>> to:
>> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>>
>> so YOUR amavisd-new will create a X-Spam-Report report on every mail, spam
>> or not.
>>
>> Gary V
>>
> i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
> ontent-Dispositio
> I would also change:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 2.0;
> to:
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = undef;
>
> so YOUR amavisd-new will create a X-Spam-Report report on every mail, spam or
> not.
>
> Gary V
>
i did this but i still dont see x-spam-report
ontent-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.
Gary wrote:
> You can add as many domains you would like to @local_domains_maps.
> @local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain"] ["localhost"] [".despiertapr.com"] );
Sorry, I blew it there, was not paying attention. This should read:
@local_domains_maps = ( [".$mydomain", 'localhost', '.despiertapr.co
boricua wrote:
> below is sample of what i mean, i modified my amavis.conf to discfard bad
> headers, but if i dont do that this email which is spam would make it to
> inbox
> how do i know which headers are added by my server?
> shouldd the spam status local trigger the spam chk?
> Return-Pat
below is sample of what i mean, i modified my amavis.conf to discfard bad
headers, but if i dont do that this email which is spam would make it to inbox
how do i know which headers are added by my server?
shouldd the spam status local trigger the spam chk?
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: bad-heade
boricua wrote:
> i am using postfix and amavisd-new
> in postfix i have the following.
> content_filter = smtp-amavis:[127.0.0.1]:10024
> which with the lirrlw i know leads to believe this will cause all mail to go
> thru amavis
^^
what?
>
>
> You have mail delivered to your server, then you get your mail from a
> different server? I don't understand.
a diff email account i fetchmail it
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 20
CTED]>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: boricua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] spam in inbox
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of boricua
> Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 10:11 AM
> To: AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] spam in inbox
>
>
> most of my spam get to /var/vir
boricua wrote:
> most of my spam get to /var/virusmail
> i am using postfix/amavisd-new
> but some eventhough tere tag as spam they go to my inbox any hints
> thanks for any tips on getting this right
> essage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Beattymail v2.9
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Ty
most of my spam get to /var/virusmail
i am using postfix/amavisd-new
but some eventhough tere tag as spam they go to my inbox any hints
thanks for any tips on getting this right
essage-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Beattymail v2.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-asci
19 matches
Mail list logo
