Re: [AMaViS-user] turned off spam checking, but still checking

Mark Martinec a écrit : ...My guess is the emji.net headers were there prior to blast.com accepting this message. ... So it looks like existing X-Spam headers are not removed unless spam scanning is enabled. It does not mean blast.com is scanning. Indeed. There is no need to remove such

Re: [AMaViS-user] turned off spam checking, but still checking

> ...My guess is the emji.net headers were there prior to blast.com accepting > this message. ... > So it looks like existing X-Spam headers are not removed unless spam > scanning is enabled. It does not mean blast.com is scanning. Indeed. There is no need to remove such pre-existing headers unl

Re: [AMaViS-user] turned off spam checking, but still checking

Anne wrote: > I turned of spam checking in /etc/amavis.conf: > @bypass_spam_checks_maps = (1); # uncomment to DISABLE anti-spam code > because I just want virus checking. I see this in my log on startup: > Sep 6 13:50:46 hedwig amavis[15431]: ANTI-SPAM codeNOT loaded > but I still ge

[AMaViS-user] turned off spam checking, but still checking

I turned of spam checking in /etc/amavis.conf: @bypass_spam_checks_maps = (1); # uncomment to DISABLE anti-spam code because I just want virus checking. I see this in my log on startup: Sep 6 13:50:46 hedwig amavis[15431]: ANTI-SPAM codeNOT loaded but I still get these headers when I