Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
Marcin, MY BIG THANKS!! I simply thought the RAM ends at 0x4000.. So 0x40af = 16559 what is aproximately the magic number 16557 !!! Thanks again and sorry for my spaming the list.. Good night, Pito. - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Marcin Cieslak" Komu: "pito" Předmět: Re

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, pito wrote: > Marcin, when I do .s I see an address higher then 16383 (16557). So > it is an indication for me something must be wrong there. Matthias > sent the .s definition, from what I can see is he prints out the > address (of RAM - I do assume - when talking data stack),

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
Marcin, the .lst I've sent you (zip) produces this: > ver amforth 4.0 ATmega1284P ok > 123 ok > .s 0 16557 123 ok >456 ok > .s 0 16555 456 1 16557 123 ok > Pito. - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Marcin Cieslak" Komu: "pito" Předmět: Re: [Amforth-de

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, pito wrote: > I hope you are asking for this .lst (:-)). The whole .lst is 280k. Can you gzip it and publish somewhere? Or mail me privately. --Marcin -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) A

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
und amforth" Předmět: Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p Datum: 28.8.2010 - 22:30:10 > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, pito wrote: > > > Matthias, > > something is telling me that the adress (the > > 16557)cannot be higher > > > than > > 16384. P

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, pito wrote: > Marcin, when I do .s I see an address higher then 16383 (16557). So > it is an indication for me something must be wrong there. Matthias > sent the .s definition, from what I can see is he prints out the > address (of RAM - I do assume - when talking data stack),

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
.. So outside the RAM space. Maybe I am mistaken.. Just explain to me plz.. Assembly listing of what, please? P. - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Marcin Cieslak" Komu: "Everything around amforth" Předmět: Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p Datum: 28.8.2010 - 22:30:10 > On Sat,

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread Marcin Cieslak
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, pito wrote: > Matthias, > something is telling me that the adress (the 16557)cannot be higher > than > 16384. P. Do you have an assembly .lst listing or can produce one? --Marcin -- Sell apps to mil

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
Matthias, something is telling me that the adress (the 16557)cannot be higher than 16384. P. - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "Matthias Trute" Komu: "Everything around amforth" Předmět: Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p Datum: 28.8.2010 - 14:41:15 > Pito, > > >

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread Matthias Trute
Pito, > it is not stack address, but the 16557 does not fit somehow...p. current implementation is like : .s sp@ depth 1- 0 ?do dup i dup u. ( gives the "index" ) 2* + dup u. ( prints the address ) @ u.( prints the current content ) cr loop drop ; (just

Re: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-28 Thread pito
it is not stack address, but the 16557 does not fit somehow...p. - PŮVODNÍ ZPRÁVA - Od: "pito" Komu: [email protected] Předmět: [Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p Datum: 27.8.2010 - 23:52:16 > Hi, > is this stack address correct (decimal)? > > > .s

[Amforth-devel] .s on 1284p

2010-08-27 Thread pito
Hi, is this stack address correct (decimal)? > .s ok > 123 ok > .s 0 16557 123 ok > 456 ok > .s 0 16555 456 1 16557 123 ok > p. -- Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program Be part of this