OK, I didn't see this before I sent my previous message -- great!
Thanks for confirming.
On 9/5/10 7:00 PM, Sep Ng wrote:
> I have run some tests and Majid's changes fixed the bug, so I don't
> think my patch is relevant anymore.
>
> Cheers.
--
Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com
I have run some tests and Majid's changes fixed the bug, so I don't
think my patch is relevant anymore.
Cheers.
On Sep 4, 11:12 am, Sep Ng wrote:
> Yes sir! As soon as possible, I will look at it and determine whether
> it's still relevant. I'll post a new diff if needed.
>
> On Sep 4, 10:55 a
Yes sir! As soon as possible, I will look at it and determine whether
it's still relevant. I'll post a new diff if needed.
On Sep 4, 10:55 am, Dossy Shiobara wrote:
> After you test the latest code from Majid, determine if your patch is
> still relevant. If it is, I'll merge it in.
>
> On 8/3
After you test the latest code from Majid, determine if your patch is
still relevant. If it is, I'll merge it in.
On 8/31/10 7:17 PM, Sep Ng wrote:
> Okay, I guess I'll simply post the diff patch here for anyone who
> needs it.
--
Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://doss
Okay, I guess I'll simply post the diff patch here for anyone who
needs it.
--- nsmemcache.c.4.5.1 2010-08-30 06:56:06.0 +0800
+++ nsmemcache.c2010-08-30 11:19:20.0 +0800
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
#define MC_SERVER_DELETED 2 /* Server is not used
anymore */
int Ns_
Hi,
I've been trying to use nsmemcache and integrate it with aolserver but
I noticed that there's this bug where if you retrieve data over 2kb,
the data gets truncated. After inspection, it looks like it's because
the buffer size allocated when reading the contents via Ns_SockRecv is
not adequate
