Re: [arch-general] cairo and cairo-lcd conflict preventing me from getting updates

2008-04-21 Thread Karolina Lindqvist
måndagen den 21 april 2008 skrev Alec Hussey: > I obviously want to keep that package and I even entered it in > pacman.conf under HoldPkg and seems to have no affect. I dont know what > I should do. > > Thanks! > Alec Hussey If cairo-lcd is a variation of cairo, it should provide cairo, and conf

Re: [arch-general] cairo and cairo-lcd conflict preventing me from getting updates

2008-04-21 Thread Hussam Al-Tayeb
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:13 -0400, Alec Hussey wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Ive been kind of frustrated lately because I haven't been able to update > any of my pacakges because of a conflict between cairo and cairo-lcd. > Here is the output from pacman. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo pacma

Re: [arch-general] cairo and cairo-lcd conflict preventing me from getting updates

2008-04-21 Thread Jeffrey Lynn Parke Jr.
just remove cairo then On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Alec Hussey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Ive been kind of frustrated lately because I haven't been able to update > any of my pacakges because of a conflict between cairo and cairo-lcd. > Here is the output from pacman. > >

[arch-general] cairo and cairo-lcd conflict preventing me from getting updates

2008-04-21 Thread Alec Hussey
Hey everyone, Ive been kind of frustrated lately because I haven't been able to update any of my pacakges because of a conflict between cairo and cairo-lcd. Here is the output from pacman. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo pacman -Syu :: Synchronizing package databases... core i

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread w9ya
Guys this discussion is about to, if it has not already, become circular. That's o.k. too, but you guys are not comprehending the information in some of these emails. Um, the answer to this is the same for ANY two or more packages that may be used to do the same thing. And that has already been an

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread François Charette
Thomas Bächler a écrit : Thomas Bächler schrieb: 2) move tetex and all packages depending on it from extra to community (that's only: kile, latex2html, lyx, texmacs) (the trouble is that these makedep on tetex: evince, kdegraphics, yodl; but maybe just keep tetex on the build machine fo

Re: [arch-general] kernel26 2.6.25-1 enters [testing]

2008-04-21 Thread Attila
On Sonntag, 20. April 2008 13:42 Attila wrote: Sorry for commenting myself and see this please only as an information. > Okay, now i can say that nvidia 173.08 works and it seems that if you > run /etc/start_udev the /dev/nvdia* devices get killed. I step back to a patched 169.12 because i have

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread Attila
On Montag, 21. April 2008 11:45 Thomas Bächler wrote: > Ha! texlive-core already provides tetex. Therefore, you can use all > applications that depend on tetex with texlive instead. This situation > is good enough for me. But there is still the problem that if you do "pacman -S kile" (or auctex,

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread Jan Spakula
Excerpts from Thomas Bächler's message of Mon Apr 21 04:45:06 -0500 2008: > Thomas Bächler schrieb: > > We could make sure that either these packages depend on a virtual "tex" > > package that is provided by texlive or make texlive provide tetex. > > Ha! texlive-core already provides tetex. There

Re: [arch-general] alternate dependencies?

2008-04-21 Thread Dan McGee
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Xavier wrote: > > > That's what provisions are for. > > > > > Wouln't that require that e.g. tetex and texlive have something like? > > provides=( "tex" ) > > In practice, how many packages include such a generi

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread Thomas Bächler
Thomas Bächler schrieb: 2) move tetex and all packages depending on it from extra to community (that's only: kile, latex2html, lyx, texmacs) (the trouble is that these makedep on tetex: evince, kdegraphics, yodl; but maybe just keep tetex on the build machine for a time being?) We c

Re: [arch-general] alternate dependencies?

2008-04-21 Thread Xavier
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Neil Darlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouln't that require that e.g. tetex and texlive have something like? > > provides=( "tex" ) > > In practice, how many packages include such a generic provides entry? From > what I've seen most packages' depends rely sole

Re: [arch-general] alternate dependencies?

2008-04-21 Thread Neil Darlow
Hi, Xavier wrote: That's what provisions are for. Wouln't that require that e.g. tetex and texlive have something like? provides=( "tex" ) In practice, how many packages include such a generic provides entry? From what I've seen most packages' depends rely solely on the package name. I t

Re: [arch-general] texlive (again?)

2008-04-21 Thread Thomas Bächler
Jan Spakula schrieb: Proposal: Switch to texlive eventually officially (for now keeping tex-related pkgs in community). Switch? Isn't that your job? How it can be done: - from the dev side: 1) "officially" announce that the switch *is* going to happen. There is no such thing as a "switch".