Re: [arch-general] Catalyst still in svn trunk

2009-09-18 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:20 PM, wrote: > Hi , > catalyst was removed from the repos for months (now available from the AUR) > but the build files are still in svn trunk : > http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/catalyst/trunk/ > > That causes tools like pbget (which can search for build files i

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread Piyush P Kurur
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 11:39:28AM -0400, David Rosenstrauch wrote: > On 09/18/2009 11:17 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >> * forget about XDM/GDM/KDM and use startx, or a direct autologin from >> /etc/inittab! > > Or use qingy. > > DR or xmonad ppk

[arch-general] Catalyst still in svn trunk

2009-09-18 Thread Nezmer
Hi , catalyst was removed from the repos for months (now available from the AUR) but the build files are still in svn trunk : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/catalyst/trunk/ That causes tools like pbget (which can search for build files in svn then AUR) to fetch the old broken unsupported

[arch-general] Please update the "gavl" package or gstreamer will continue breaking

2009-09-18 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
Hey, the current gavl package in [community] is seemingly compiled with wrong CFLAGS and thus it breaks on older CPUs in conjunction with the newest gstreamer update. I flagged the package a week ago and shot the maintainer a mail but no answer. Can somebody update the package real quick please? D

Re: [arch-general] An evil idea --- use Git to manage the repositories

2009-09-18 Thread Caleb Cushing
you should all go look at funtoo... since it already uses git with portage for package management.

Re: [arch-general] lost-packages in testing/os/any/ @ FTP [season 2]

2009-09-18 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Aaron Griffin wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Gerardo Exequiel >> Pozzi wrote: >> >>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >>> Hi, First: There are some lost packages in testing/os/any/ in the FTP [#1] that

Re: [arch-general] An evil idea --- use Git to manage the repositories

2009-09-18 Thread nekomancer davion
Not a new distro, goodness no. Just an alternate package management system, which would work something like this: It would be transparent with pacman. On could easily use pacman or it interchangeably, but this would have additional package management 'tools'. Many functions, such as installing a

Re: [arch-general] Community db missing ?

2009-09-18 Thread David C. Rankin
On Friday 18 September 2009 11:15:01 am Aaron Griffin wrote: > > What happened ? Is it the same issue like the last time when a lot of > > packages were lost ? > > Nope. It was user error (my fault). I screwed up an rsync config and > it decided to delete files. It wasn't caught right away :blush:

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread David C. Rankin
On Friday 18 September 2009 07:49:07 am Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Daenyth Blank wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 17:04, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: > >> The other is that I had trouble finding a truly lightweight X terminal > >> (there were times when xterm was considered

Re: [arch-general] Community db missing ?

2009-09-18 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Panos wrote: > On Friday 18 September 2009 09:28:07 Eric Bélanger wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:59 AM,   wrote: >> > hi , >> > What's going on ? >> > The 2 mirrors I use give 404 error when trying to fetch community db . >> >> Hi, >> >> The community repo wa

Re: [arch-general] Community db missing ?

2009-09-18 Thread Panos
On Friday 18 September 2009 09:28:07 Eric Bélanger wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:59 AM, wrote: > > hi , > > What's going on ? > > The 2 mirrors I use give 404 error when trying to fetch community db . > > Hi, > > The community repo was accidentally removed from the main server. It > is cu

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread David Rosenstrauch
On 09/18/2009 11:17 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: * forget about XDM/GDM/KDM and use startx, or a direct autologin from /etc/inittab! Or use qingy. DR

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: 2009/9/18 Dimitrios Apostolou On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: I'm using Arch on a old Sony Vaio: pentium II 200MHz with ~64MB of ram. It Cool, especially since you have desktop software on it... How did you manage to install

Re: [arch-general] crypto++ broken on arch? (unable to link)

2009-09-18 Thread Caleb Cushing
http://groups.google.com/group/cryptopp-users/browse_thread/thread/dfe40b4eed04f03d discussion can be followed there. still trying to work out what's going code does work against 5.6.0 just not on arch... -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread Nicolas Bigaouette
2009/9/18 Dimitrios Apostolou > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: > > I'm using Arch on a old Sony Vaio: pentium II 200MHz with ~64MB of ram. It >> > > Cool, especially since you have desktop software on it... How did you > manage to install with only 64MB RAM? Note that I'm not s

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Daenyth Blank wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 17:04, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: The other is that I had trouble finding a truly lightweight X terminal (there were times when xterm was considered bloated ;) so I packaged myself rxvt. Most other distributions offer it so in c

Re: [arch-general] archlinux on old hardware

2009-09-18 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: I'm using Arch on a old Sony Vaio: pentium II 200MHz with ~64MB of ram. It Cool, especially since you have desktop software on it... How did you manage to install with only 64MB RAM? is running LXDE. It is slow to boot, but I suspend without p

Re: [arch-general] community broken

2009-09-18 Thread David Dupin
Le Fri, 18 Sep 2009 17:32:17 +1000, Allan McRae a écrit : > Seems to be back as Allan says. I was surprised to see that Chromium support FTP when click on link

Re: [arch-general] community broken

2009-09-18 Thread Allan McRae
Sergej Pupykin wrote: Hi, I want to notice that community packages disappeared. ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/ Its known. Packages are syncing back as we speak. Allan

[arch-general] community broken

2009-09-18 Thread Sergej Pupykin
Hi, I want to notice that community packages disappeared. ftp://ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/