Guys, if any of you are subscribed to planet arch, then you must have
noticed a problem with some of the feeds.
The problem is, the summary of the feed displays fine, but when i open the
feed, it shows the xml of the feed instead of showing the website.
http://planet.archlinux.org/atom.xml (this
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Mark Pustjens wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> The attached patch fixes a TODO in lib-pacman of aif.
> Instead of hardcoding that `core' is always available locally and falling
> back to net for others, it now checks /src/ for repos.
>
> It assumes repos are stored at /src/$r
On Fri 19 Feb 2010 22:26 +0100, Mark Pustjens wrote:
> The attached patch fixes a TODO in lib-pacman of aif.
> Instead of hardcoding that `core' is always available locally and
> falling back to net for others, it now checks /src/ for repos.
>
> It assumes repos are stored at /src/$repo/pkg/. All
Hi List,
The attached patch fixes a TODO in lib-pacman of aif.
Instead of hardcoding that `core' is always available locally and falling
back to net for others, it now checks /src/ for repos.
It assumes repos are stored at /src/$repo/pkg/. All these repos are added
as cache dirs.
While prep
On 02/19/2010 08:07 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
>> I guess that will happen when postfix dev release the final stable
>> version, right now it seems to be just a stable _release candidate_.
>
> I show on their site that Postfix 2.7.0 is rele
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM, dave reisner wrote:
> Geez, a whole week? Arch must be falling apart at the seams.
I was pretty clear in my initial post that I was asking if there is a
way a user can view package release schedules. I used Postfix as an
example. I wasn't making any accusation tha
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Santos
> wrote:
> > I guess that will happen when postfix dev release the final stable
> > version, right now it seems to be just a stable _release candidate_.
>
> I show on their site that Postfix 2.
On 02/19/2010 10:07 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
I guess that will happen when postfix dev release the final stable
version, right now it seems to be just a stable _release candidate_.
I show on their site that Postfix 2.7.0 is released as s
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Mauro Santos
wrote:
> I guess that will happen when postfix dev release the final stable
> version, right now it seems to be just a stable _release candidate_.
I show on their site that Postfix 2.7.0 is released as stable and not
a R.C. Am I missing something?
ht
On 02/19/2010 07:36 PM, Carlos Williams wrote:
> I was curious how a user like myself can find out when the 'Postfix'
> package from Arch Linux will be upgraded from 2.6.5 to 2.7.0? Is there
> a way I can see the release schedule or a round about guess-tamite as
> to when it will be released?
>
I
I was curious how a user like myself can find out when the 'Postfix'
package from Arch Linux will be upgraded from 2.6.5 to 2.7.0? Is there
a way I can see the release schedule or a round about guess-tamite as
to when it will be released?
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:00, LI Ye wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Just paste my post from forum. Have you guys encountered this issue
>> after recent upgrades of vim & gvim:
>>
>> ** (gvim:17054): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: asse
Hello,
Rorschach wrote:
> Hi, I have written a small patch for rc.sysinit which gives the user
> the ability to abort a forced filesystem check with pressing the
> escape-key. I haven't found another feature-request in the bugtracker
> for this so I opened one: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18400
Hi,
I have written a small patch for rc.sysinit which gives the user the ability to
abort a forced filesystem check with pressing the escape-key. I haven't found
another feature-request in the bugtracker for this so I opened one:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18400 .
What do you think about it
Am 19.02.2010 16:40, schrieb Ray Kohler:
> Add the "resume" hook to the end of the HOOKS list in
> /etc/mkinitcpio.conf and rebuild your initramfs. This has to be added
> manually now with the non-klibc mkinitcpio.
Actually, all documentation I knew of always said it was necessary to
add it. The o
At Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 12:01 Heiko Baums wrote:
> Right, that's what NoUpgrade in pacman.conf does. ;-)
Thanks for the smiley at the end because i was very silly (oder anderes gesagt
die Leitung auf der ich stand ging mindestens zweimal um die Erde -) ).
See you, Attila
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Javier Vasquez
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Previously I was having the following settings:
>
> /etc/default/grub
> --
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT='resume=/dev/sda5'
>
> grub.cfg
> ---
> linux /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda7 ro resume=/dev/sda5
>
Hi all,
Previously I was having the following settings:
/etc/default/grub
--
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT='resume=/dev/sda5'
grub.cfg
---
linux /vmlinuz26 root=/dev/sda7 ro resume=/dev/sda5
I have installed:
acpitool 0.5.1-1
kernel26 2.6.32.8-1
And fro quiet a lon
Am Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:51:40 +0100
schrieb Attila :
> Oh, so if someone use 'usr/lib/*' than the lib of every new or
> updated package will get installed with the '.pacnew' ending?
Right, that's what NoUpgrade in pacman.conf does. ;-)
Greetings,
Heiko
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:00, LI Ye wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just paste my post from forum. Have you guys encountered this issue
> after recent upgrades of vim & gvim:
>
> ** (gvim:17054): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion
> `static_gravity_supported' failed
>
> ** (gvim:17054): CR
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 20:50, clemens fischer <
ino-n...@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org> wrote:
> I thought multi-session CDs must be "finished" or "finalized" before
> they can be fully used?
>
Do not know...my pc boots them without problems...so i think it's not a
problem of "writing" method...
Hi guys,
Just paste my post from forum. Have you guys encountered this issue
after recent upgrades of vim & gvim:
** (gvim:17054): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion
`static_gravity_supported' failed
** (gvim:17054): CRITICAL **: gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion
`static_gr
22 matches
Mail list logo
