Re: [arch-general] BASH no longer does 'for i in $(ls); do ls $i; done'??

2010-05-19 Thread Caleb Cushing
you can also use "env ls" which I believe gets ls from the PATH -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [arch-general] BASH no longer does 'for i in $(ls); do ls $i; done'??

2010-05-19 Thread Crouse
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > > If this is the case, replace "ls" with "/bin/ls" in the above and try again > or if your REALLY lazy like me :) \ls the "\" runs the real ls, not the aliased version. However, Aaron's way will always work, and is usually way I use com

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New core package: linux-firmware

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 05/19/2010 07:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 20.05.2010 00:49, schrieb Matthew Monaco: Does anyone know what the point of that radeon hook in the AUR is then? All it does is add the radeon module and include the "radeon" firmware files - which I see are listed by 'modinfo radeon' anyway.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New core package: linux-firmware

2010-05-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 20.05.2010 00:49, schrieb Matthew Monaco: > Does anyone know what the point of that radeon hook in the AUR is then? > All it does is add the radeon module and include the "radeon" firmware > files - which I see are listed by 'modinfo radeon' anyway. > It has no point at all. signature.asc D

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New core package: linux-firmware

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 05/19/2010 06:40 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 20.05.2010 00:30, schrieb Matthew Monaco: Maybe this is a little premature, or altogether irrelevant, but now that we're reorganizing all of the firmware what can we expect in terms of its inclusion in the initcpio? Is there a direct relationship

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New core package: linux-firmware

2010-05-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 20.05.2010 00:30, schrieb Matthew Monaco: > Maybe this is a little premature, or altogether irrelevant, but now that > we're reorganizing all of the firmware what can we expect in terms of > its inclusion in the initcpio? > > Is there a direct relationship between modules and firmware so that j

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] New core package: linux-firmware

2010-05-19 Thread Matthew Monaco
On 05/19/2010 05:39 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: As a followup to a discussion on [arch-general] in the Linux 2.6.34 thread ([1] and others), I think we should do the following: - Create a linux-firmware package from the linux-firmware.git tree. - Make that package conflict and replace all other fi

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] phoronix: Is Arch faster than Ubuntu?

2010-05-19 Thread Xavier Chantry
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Dan McGee wrote: >> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Aaron Griffin >> wrote: >>> Came across my reader today >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_arch_faster&num=1 >>> >>> Pretty

[arch-general] Article about aircrack in the wiki

2010-05-19 Thread Karol Babioch
Hi, I don't know whether my memory is right on that, but as far as I can remember there was an article in the wiki describing how to setup and use the aircrack- ng suite. I can't find this one anymore :(. Therefore I suppose it has been deleted. Am I right on this? If so, was there any specific

Re: [arch-general] Checkgmail doesn't work with perl 5.12 from testing

2010-05-19 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Firmicus wrote: > Any other since? communities perl-list-moreutils needs a rebuild. ran into a problem installing moose this morning. rebuilding this package fixed it. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com

Re: [arch-general] pkg-proxy ?

2010-05-19 Thread C Anthony Risinger
> like: > - does the code in "how to use" box at the forum post go in the > pacproxy machine configs ? do you mean the client machines? yes you just point the clients to the proxy as if it were another mirror. you setup the actual mirror by editing this line: mirrors = {'mirrors.gigenet.com': '

[arch-general] NFS v3 file locking issue with OpenOffice

2010-05-19 Thread Andreas Radke
Am Thu, 13 May 2010 16:37:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Radke : > upstream update 2.6.32.13. our gcc4.5 patch went upstream. > > -Andy > Since I've updated my server from .27 lts kernel to .32 series I've run into a small but annoying issue. I'm running nfs v3 nothing special. my options in /etc/e

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread C Anthony Risinger
eb Evangelos Foutras: >> >>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1 >> >>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has >> >>> indeed been added to the linux-firmware repository, which should resolve

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio package group

2010-05-19 Thread Gan Lu
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:36 PM, b1 wrote: > Hi > > Since I am just a comperativly inexperienced user, it took me some time > to get pulseaudio working (Digging the forum to change the asound.conf, > getting vlc to work with pulse by the aur-package). > I think it would be great having a package g

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread Jan de Groot
lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1 > >>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has > >>> indeed been added to the linux-firmware repository, which should resolve > >>> FS#19519 [2]. > >> > >> I did that too and noticed

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.05.2010 16:19, schrieb Dan McGee: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: >>> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1 >>> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It sho

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread Dan McGee
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: >> Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1 >> and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has >> indeed been added

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio package group

2010-05-19 Thread b1
Hi Since I am just a comperativly inexperienced user, it took me some time to get pulseaudio working (Digging the forum to change the asound.conf, getting vlc to work with pulse by the aur-package). I think it would be great having a package group, with which I could install all this stuff at once

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread Thomas Bächler
Am 19.05.2010 10:56, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: > Also did a diff [1] between the file lists of kernel26-firmware-2.6.34-1 > and linux-firmware-git-20100519-1. It shows that ralink firmware has > indeed been added to the linux-firmware repository, which should resolve > FS#19519 [2].

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.34-1

2010-05-19 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 19/05/10 02:10, Thomas Bächler wrote: This file lacks some conflicts/provides, but you should be able to install it instead of kernel26-firmware. http://dev.archlinux.org/~thomas/linux-firmware-git-20100519-1-any.pkg.tar.xz Let me know what you think. Also, there have been some reports about

Re: [arch-general] PulseAudio package group

2010-05-19 Thread Ray Rashif
On 19/05/2010, Jan Steffens wrote: > The problem with doing that is some packages will indeed have to > *depend* and not just optdepend on PA. There are some cases where you can get away with it when there is no hard runtime dependency on the library in question. You can have them as makedepends

Re: [arch-general] BASH no longer does 'for i in $(ls); do ls $i; done'??

2010-05-19 Thread David C. Rankin
On 05/19/2010 01:48 AM, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 01:41 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote: >> So the bottom line is don't alias 'ls'. And, I guess, the next >> question would >> be, how or where can I safely customize the behavior of ls without >> screwing >> myself again. > > Soluti