We want to replace the LTS kernel series .27 soon with the .32 series.
The .32 series has been in testing now for a while. Please test if
anything is broken for you apart from broken modules you have built
your own. Maybe we provide module packages in the future.
One issue is known in .32 series:
"This used to be about free sharing of code,
but now we need lawyers involved just to do that? Whenever a lawyer is
involved, there is certainly no freedom, just random blabla that nobody
understands."
I think you've hit the nail on the head there, Thomas. We should never
lose sight of basic value
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 09:21:07AM +0530, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, papul wrote:
> > Sorry for this useless message. testing some service.
> >
> >
>
> You're send a test message to 500-1000 people on a mailing list.
> Idiotic. Create a mail account on another p
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 11:22 PM, Keith Hinton wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> The subject should spell it out, but what I'm wondering is if there is any
>> way to force Arch to not probe for say eth0 when eth1 is prefered over eth0
>> and such?
>> Thanks for any
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:58 AM, papul wrote:
> Sorry for this useless message. testing some service.
>
>
You're send a test message to 500-1000 people on a mailing list.
Idiotic. Create a mail account on another provider and test your
thing. Don't annoy us. Mr. Aaron may ban you if you do this o
On 28/05/10 13:08, papul wrote:
Hi,
How can i test KDE beta in arch? Do i have to compile everything or is
there a beta software repo available for testing?
Thanks,
Papul
If you are prepared for breakage... enable the [kde-unstable] repo:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=97899
Hi,
How can i test KDE beta in arch? Do i have to compile everything or is
there a beta software repo available for testing?
Thanks,
Papul
Python is powerful, easier to learn/read/write(compare to perl),
lightful(compare to C++/Java), thats why python is sexy.
Dual-boot linuxs is never a problem to grub, i guess that why never any
document got such topic detailed, all you need to do is to modify
/boot/grub/menu.lst, even not at all
Sorry for this useless message. testing some service.
Am 27.05.2010 23:08, schrieb Ray Kohler:
> You need "force" option for cryptsetup because 1.1.1_rc2-1 sorts as
> newer than 1.1.1-1:
>
> warning: cryptsetup: local (1.1.1_rc2-1) is newer than testing (1.1.1-1)
>
I think I'm not going to add it. The 'force' option introduces some very
weird behav
> >> I've set up my system so that when I close the laptop lid the computer
> >> goes into suspend mode. However, when I wake it up by pressing the power
> >> button the system
> >> starts, and after 3-5 sec it goes into suspend mode again. If I then press
> >> the power button again, it start
Why wouldn't you install both?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:17:42 +0200, John K Pate
> wrote:
>
> Maybe just compare the websites... obviously Python wins! :)
>>>
>>
>> At any rate, there's no reason not to install both euphoria and python.
On Thu, 27 May 2010 23:17:42 +0200, John K Pate
wrote:
Maybe just compare the websites... obviously Python wins! :)
At any rate, there's no reason not to install both euphoria and python.
If you're planning on sticking with a distribution like Arch that
requires you to `look under the h
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jeroen Op 't Eynde wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:48:38 +0200, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Lowe
wrote:
> I'm new to Arch Linux & Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
> questions...
> Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboo
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> I put updated device-mapper/lvm2 2.02.66 and cryptsetup 1.1.1
> packages to testing.
>
> These packages enable udev synchronization to finally get rid of all
> race conditions related to udev rules. I also cleaned up the PKGBUILDs
> massivel
On Thu, 27 May 2010 18:48:38 +0200, Nilesh Govindarajan
wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Lowe
wrote:
I'm new to Arch Linux & Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
questions...
Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboot installation? I've read some
documentation
and
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:42 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 04:21 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
>>
>> python is no requirement for Arch Linux itself. If you do not like it,
>> just do not install it.
>
> Isn't pacman written in python? That would make python a requirement for
> Arch th
On Thu 27 May 2010 16:42 -0400, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 04:21 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
> >python is no requirement for Arch Linux itself. If you do not like it,
> >just do not install it.
>
> Isn't pacman written in python? That would make python a
> requirement for Arch then,
On 05/27/2010 04:21 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
python is no requirement for Arch Linux itself. If you do not like it,
just do not install it.
Isn't pacman written in python? That would make python a requirement
for Arch then, right?
DR
On 05/27/2010 11:22 PM, Keith Hinton wrote:
Hi all,
The subject should spell it out, but what I'm wondering is if there is any way
to force Arch to not probe for say eth0 when eth1 is prefered over eth0 and
such?
Thanks for any help on that question!
Basically eth0 is my laptop's ethernet card,
Hi all,
The subject should spell it out, but what I'm wondering is if there is any way
to force Arch to not probe for say eth0 when eth1 is prefered over eth0 and
such?
Thanks for any help on that question!
Basically eth0 is my laptop's ethernet card, while eth1 is the wireless card.
While the w
Am 27.05.2010 18:42, schrieb David Lowe:
I'm new to Arch Linux& Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
questions...
Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboot installation? I've read some
documentation
and it seems to be iffy on this point.
Also, why are most Linux users and programmers
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 27.05.2010 17:52, schrieb Loui Chang:
>
> When has that happened? I would gladly package cdrtools. I know from
> many users that it is superior to cdrkit (although I never had any
> trouble with either of them). However, I fear that some
On Thu 27 May 2010 14:41 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-January/010357.html
> > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-May/013557.html
>
> eh? more circles?
What
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-January/010357.html
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2010-May/013557.html
eh? more circles?
On Thu 27 May 2010 19:11 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> When has that hap
On Thu 27 May 2010 19:11 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 27.05.2010 17:52, schrieb Loui Chang:
> > Anyways, it's been stated that
> > licensing isn't really the issue any more. The fact is no Dev or TU is
> > interested in maintaining cdrtools. Jörg has something to learn about
> > how to deal wi
I put updated device-mapper/lvm2 2.02.66 and cryptsetup 1.1.1
packages to testing.
These packages enable udev synchronization to finally get rid of all
race conditions related to udev rules. I also cleaned up the PKGBUILDs
massively and removed all static binaries and libraries from the packages.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, David Lowe wrote:
> I'm new to Arch Linux & Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
> questions...
> Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboot installation? I've read some
> documentation
> and it seems to be iffy on this point.
> Also, why are most Linux
On Thu 27 May 2010 18:32 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Loui Chang wrote:
> > That would be nice and useful if people actually believed that there
> > would be an end to this discussion. Anyways, it's been stated that
> > licensing isn't really the issue any more. The fact is no Dev or TU is
> >
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:55:24PM +0530, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Joerg does has few odd things maybe because he is wrong or we are
> wrong but either way; we shouldn't be rude to him.he is the reason we
> have working cd/dvd burning support on Linux. AFAIK, he is working on
> cdrtools since 1995,
Am 27.05.2010 17:52, schrieb Loui Chang:
> Anyways, it's been stated that
> licensing isn't really the issue any more. The fact is no Dev or TU is
> interested in maintaining cdrtools. Jörg has something to learn about
> how to deal with people, but he's too stubborn to take any advice.
When has t
On 05/27/2010 08:02 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
saw this updated this morning and got curious as to why. I looked at
it and it seems little more than a PKGBUILD improvement... nothing
that would affect current users. why bump the pkgrel? also this
version isn't on abs I don't know what affects that
saw this updated this morning and got curious as to why. I looked at
it and it seems little more than a PKGBUILD improvement... nothing
that would affect current users. why bump the pkgrel? also this
version isn't on abs I don't know what affects that though.
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 PM, David Lowe wrote:
> I'm new to Arch Linux & Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
> questions...
> Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboot installation? I've read some
> documentation
> and it seems to be iffy on this point.
> Also, why are most Linux
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila wrote:
>>> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila wrote:
>> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
>>> Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads.
>>> other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg
I'm new to Arch Linux & Linux in general, so please excuse any newbie
questions...
Can the Arch Linux install do a dualboot installation? I've read some
documentation
and it seems to be iffy on this point.
Also, why are most Linux users and programmers so obsessed with Python?
I'd much rather
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Thu 27 May 2010 14:43 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
>> Dozens of people have contributed to the discussion, but no one
>> actually cares about getting some clarifications ?
>> I just don't get it.
>> I feel like I did my part of the work alrea
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Attila wrote:
> At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
>> Also the truth is one person cannot be responsible for 50+threads.
>> other people are replying to as well, so should be Joerg be blamed
>> alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only
Loui Chang wrote:
> That would be nice and useful if people actually believed that there
> would be an end to this discussion. Anyways, it's been stated that
> licensing isn't really the issue any more. The fact is no Dev or TU is
> interested in maintaining cdrtools. Jörg has something to learn
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> I think gdb is fine... but I have not used it extensively. I'd
> appreciate reports from anyone who has extensively used gdb and valgrind
> with the new glibc.
>
> Allan
>
I've been using valgrind on the new glibc. It reports a whole new
Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Peter Lewis dijo:
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 at 16:34 Peter Lewis wrote:
> > > there you go :)
> > >
> > > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37539
>
> Ah, also that /usr/bin/prism links to the pkgdir when it should link to
> /usr/lib/prism-1.0b4/bin/p
On Thu 27 May 2010 14:43 +0200, Xavier Chantry wrote:
> Dozens of people have contributed to the discussion, but no one
> actually cares about getting some clarifications ?
> I just don't get it.
> I feel like I did my part of the work already by getting a report from
> Eben, just to see Joerg accu
At Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2010 16:25 Gaurish Sharma wrote:
> Joerg does has few odd things maybe because he is wrong or we are
> wrong but either way; we shouldn't be rude to him.he is the reason we
> have working cd/dvd burning support on Linux. AFAIK, he is working on
> cdrtools since 1995, much be
On Thursday 27 May 2010 at 16:34 Peter Lewis wrote:
> > there you go :)
> >
> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37539
Ah, also that /usr/bin/prism links to the pkgdir when it should link to
/usr/lib/prism-1.0b4/bin/prism
But, fixing that, it launches but just gives a window with the fo
On Thursday 27 May 2010 at 13:35 Nicolás Reynolds wrote:
> > I don't have time to do this right now, but if anyone fancies turning
> > these instructions into a prism-svn package, then I'd be happy to help
> > test.
> there you go :)
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37539
Excellent,
On 28/05/10 00:55, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sat, 2010-05-22 at 20:45 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
Glibc-2.12 toolchain rebuild. Fedora has been running something like
the glibc-2.12 release for the last few weeks so as always it should be
nice and safe.
linux-api-headers-2.6.34-1
- update
Hi,
Joerg does has few odd things maybe because he is wrong or we are
wrong but either way; we shouldn't be rude to him.he is the reason we
have working cd/dvd burning support on Linux. AFAIK, he is working on
cdrtools since 1995, much before I was knew what OSS was. he gave us
his full source code
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:56, Allan McRae wrote:
>> [it is rude not to change subject lines when going off-topic...]
>>
>> On 27/05/10 20:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> Blah, blah, blah
>>
>> Seriously, stop it. 50+ messages that are ent
On 27/05/10 23:50, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
Upstream update. Renamved from pkgconfig to pkg-config as has been done
upstream for some time now.
This looks funny to me:
$ pacman -Qi pkg-config |
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Ray Kohler wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Upstream update. Renamved from pkgconfig to pkg-config as has been done
>> upstream for some time now.
>
> This looks funny to me:
>
> $ pacman -Qi pkg-config | grep '^Provides'
> Provide
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream update. Renamved from pkgconfig to pkg-config as has been done
> upstream for some time now.
This looks funny to me:
$ pacman -Qi pkg-config | grep '^Provides'
Provides : pkgconfig=${pkgver}
Isn't it supposed to be expanded?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:56, Allan McRae wrote:
> [it is rude not to change subject lines when going off-topic...]
>
> On 27/05/10 20:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Blah, blah, blah
>
> Seriously, stop it. 50+ messages that are entirely off-topic for the
> original question.
I agree. Joerg, yo
Adam Lantos wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Damjan Georgievski
> wrote:
> > - it will put to an END to any possible misinterpretations and
> > uncertainties - now and in the future
>
> he certainly is not interested in ending these pointless battles :)
Let me correct yoour typo:
I
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Xavier Chantry
wrote:
> Then, if you want to do something about it, just go ahead and talk
> with these people Joerg kindly mentioned.
> Ask them whether they agree or disagree with Eben's interpretation
> that GPL compliance on mkisofs is broken :
> http://mailman
Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Peter Lewis dijo:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010 at 11:31 Peter Lewis wrote:
> >> The stand-alone app is only built for 32bit by upstream (that seems
to be a
> >> common situation for Mozilla stuff, rather sad if you ask me ;-).
The code
> >> is available in an
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> - it will put to an END to any possible misinterpretations and
> uncertainties - now and in the future
he certainly is not interested in ending these pointless battles :)
>> Jörg, why don't you just change the license of your cdrtools to a
>> licensing scheme - either change every part of it to the GPL, set it
>> under a dual license or whatever - which is indisputable and doubtless
>> instead of arguing with the distributors all the time over years?
>>
>> It's real
[it is rude not to change subject lines when going off-topic...]
On 27/05/10 20:13, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Blah, blah, blah
Seriously, stop it. 50+ messages that are entirely off-topic for the
original question.
This is list is for discussion about Arch Linux, not for discussing the
lic
Attila wrote:
> Sorry to say but until there is no decision from a law court i see this only
> as
> a interpersonal problem and therefore i prefer to discuss about technical
> things. Perhaps this is because i'm a former OS/2 user but what i really
> don't
> understand is the support for sof
Dear Christopher,
I have sent countless emails to many governmental, non-governmental and
international organizations in the world with the subject "Plea for
Medical Help/Assistance". But surprisingly I get very few replies. Maybe
the replies have been deleted or the emails I sent have been de
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> in the spirit of open licenses, mildly incompatible or not, include
> the best tool for the job = cdrtools.
>
> on a final note, Jeorg, it would be extremely beneficial if you could
> cite a hard resource regarding the legalities involved here, as you
> seem to have a
Mauro Santos wrote:
> > Later, some "religuous" crowd came up and claimed that Earth is flat.
> >
> > I encourage you to just ignore those people who claim that Earth is flat
> > and
> > that there is a supposed legal problem with cdrtools.
>
> Sure I can ignore people who say that Earth is fl
63 matches
Mail list logo
