Hi,
After true multilib support came for arch, I reformatted / as jfs to
install arch64.
But somehow, I feel my system is slow (in spite of regular fscks on
every ten mounts and using deadline scheduler) as compared to arch32 &
ext4.
I'm thinking of using btrfs on /, is it stable to the extent tha
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, jesse jaara wrote:
>>> Did anyone else revice some old maiöing list messages i got few about
>>> xorg1.8 miving to extra and announment if 2010.5 install
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mike Sampson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, jesse jaara wrote:
>> Did anyone else revice some old maiöing list messages i got few about
>> xorg1.8 miving to extra and announment if 2010.5 install meedia and some
>> others
>>
>
> Yeah, me too.
My RSS rea
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, jesse jaara wrote:
> Did anyone else revice some old maiöing list messages i got few about
> xorg1.8 miving to extra and announment if 2010.5 install meedia and some
> others
>
Yeah, me too.
Mike
Did anyone else revice some old maiöing list messages i got few about
xorg1.8 miving to extra and announment if 2010.5 install meedia and some
others
Are a lot of you using (or not using) the suggestions from the "Speeding up
Udev" article? I just tried it by replacing all occurrences of load-modules.sh
in /etc/udev/rules.d/*.rules and /lib/udev/rules.d/*.rules with modprobe itself,
and implemented blacklisting by adding
install MODNAME /bi
On 21-09-2010 23:17, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
On 09/21/2010 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've
found some
fairly large AUR packages that are orphaned (like RPM5). But, how do AUR
packages get new maintainers? Does somebo
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR
>>
>> Really dude? You've been using arch for how long and still have these
>> elementary questions?
I think that was not the OP question (considering his long time
participation in the community), but something like "Is there any
policy to take care of
On 09/21/2010 04:02 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I always diff any new .pacnew files when they are created during an
update.
Today I got /etc/shadow.pacnew which was a little surprising given that
replacing shadow would be bad. The diff showed that the .pacnew entries were
already i
On 09/21/2010 06:17 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
On 09/21/2010 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've
found some
fairly large AUR packages that are orphaned (like RPM5). But, how do AUR
packages get new maintainers? Does som
On 09/21/2010 04:53 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've found
some
fairly large AUR packages that are orphaned (like RPM5). But, how do AUR
packages get new maintainers? Does somebody monitor the orphans and then divvy
them o
Hello David,
If you're logged in to the AUR, any package with an orphan status will
have an "Adopt Packages" button on its page.
2010/9/21 David C. Rankin :
> Guys,
>
> I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've found
> some
> fairly large AUR packages that are orphan
Guys,
I've seen recent "Request to Ophan package XYZ" posts, and I've found
some
fairly large AUR packages that are orphaned (like RPM5). But, how do AUR
packages get new maintainers? Does somebody monitor the orphans and then divvy
them out among those with write privileges in AUR or doe
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 16:02, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I always diff any new .pacnew files when they are created during an
> update.
See "man pacman", under HANDLING CONFIG FILES. It explains the
behavior in detail.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:44:52 +0200
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
Signoff i686 lvm/encrypt
this kernel fixes Alan's[1] big sata_sil breakage, making my system boot
again. ( see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug
Guys,
I always diff any new .pacnew files when they are created during an
update.
Today I got /etc/shadow.pacnew which was a little surprising given that
replacing shadow would be bad. The diff showed that the .pacnew entries were
already in shadow (except for the root password of course)
On 09/21/2010 04:44 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
signoff x86_64
--
Ionuț
On 09/21/10 at 03:44pm, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias
> Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
> (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> tp...@archlinux.org
>
Sign off x84_64 w/ Encrypted
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Since the other thread is huge and hard to follow, I am creating a new
thread.
I would like to use this thread to talk strictly about the Local Mirror
wiki article.
I have updated the wiki article to reflect the new pool directory.
Currently there are some packages that are in pool/ while others a
On 09/21/2010 01:31 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
Hello.
Currently I see that there are some packages in
/archlinux/extra/os/i686/ and some symlinks to ../../../pool/packages/.
I was hoping a dev would be able to answer the following the questions?
Eventually, will all packages (from core/extra/
Hello.
Currently I see that there are some packages in
/archlinux/extra/os/i686/ and some symlinks to ../../../pool/packages/.
I was hoping a dev would be able to answer the following the questions?
Eventually, will all packages (from core/extra/community) end up in pool?
Repos like multilib
23 matches
Mail list logo
