Hi guys,
bump to latest version.
Please signoff both arches,
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011, Juan R. de Silva
wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:19:02 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>
>> I installed and configured gpm daemon. The daemon starts and the mouse
>> works fine, including copy-and-paste. But only in a console were I log
>> as root.
>>
>> When I open ano
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:19:02 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
> I installed and configured gpm daemon. The daemon starts and the mouse
> works fine, including copy-and-paste. But only in a console were I log
> as root.
>
> When I open another tty and login there as a normal user, the mouse
> cursor
I installed and configured gpm daemon. The daemon starts and the mouse
works fine, including copy-and-paste. But only in a console were I log as
root.
When I open another tty and login there as a normal user, the mouse
cursor is available. I mean, it is visible and moves as desired. But I
can
On 08/29/2011 03:22 PM, Simon Schneider wrote:
I got even more curious about btrfs after following this discussion
and installed it on my primary laptop (I planned a reinstall anyway to
get rid of windows). Installation worked perfectly with Archboot,
setting up two subvolumes, both compressed
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:22:37 +0200
Simon Schneider wrote:
> Btrfs is great, don't get me wrong, it really is fast and snapshots
> and all that worked really great, but it is, sadly, a little bit too
> unstable to use it anywhere than on a test machine. Even if you have
> UPS and all kind of measu
2011/8/25 C Anthony Risinger
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:44:10 -0500
> > C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> >
> >> unfortunately you can only do /boot on btrfs if you use a single disk
> >> due to bootloader limitations:
> >
> > Is it only
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 13:51, Myra Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:42, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
>> [2011-08-29 12:13:29 -0500] Myra Nelson:
>>> If I sign the
>>> package with makepkg or manually with gpg --detach-sign, it creates a
>>> it creates a detached signature, .sig file. I have my
[2011-08-29 13:51:07 -0500] Myra Nelson:
> If I use gpg --sign instead of gpg --detach-sign the package verifies
> and installs just fine. That's what stumped me.
That's because since its suffix is not sig (in that case, a gpg file is
created containing both the package and the signature) the sign
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, XeCycle wrote:
> Hope I'm not disturbing~ But I don't know whether this worth a bug
> report.
>
> The package `emacs-color-theme' uses the stable release, released in
> 2006. In 2007, there's a commit fixing a bug (for me, the bug causes
> conflict with Gnus), b
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:42, Gaetan Bisson wrote:
> [2011-08-29 12:13:29 -0500] Myra Nelson:
>> If I sign the
>> package with makepkg or manually with gpg --detach-sign, it creates a
>> it creates a detached signature, .sig file. I have my key using
>> pacman-key. When I attempt to install the p
[2011-08-29 12:13:29 -0500] Myra Nelson:
> If I sign the
> package with makepkg or manually with gpg --detach-sign, it creates a
> it creates a detached signature, .sig file. I have my key using
> pacman-key. When I attempt to install the package I get an error
> message "invalid or corrupted packa
I'm going to plead ignorance hear and have not been able to find the
solution. I've done a google search, read the man pages, read the help
documentation for gpg, and I still have a problem. If I sign the
package with makepkg or manually with gpg --detach-sign, it creates a
it creates a detached si
Does anyone know, when and why the results of "ip route" in recent times
are not sorted by netmask specificness?
I remember previously routes were sorted most specific first by the netmask.
--
damjan
14 matches
Mail list logo
