On 16/03/2019 13:24, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> suggest replacing xz with lzip as xz has quite a few flaws in its file format.
I seem to remember that this has been debunked/ruled out as irrelevant
to package distribution every time it has been proposed to Debian, e.g.
it even has worse decompression
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 16:16:22 +0100
n...@contrepoison.ch wrote:
> Even if you do what it says in the wiki ?
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Budgie#Changing_button_layout
First command work not and second goes without message but it help
nothing.
--
Silvio
De: siefke_lis...@web.de
Envoyé: 16 mars 2019 16:07
À: arch-general@archlinux.org
Répondre à: arch-general@archlinux.org
Objet: [arch-general] Window Decoration Budgi
Hello,
I have installed new Arch Linux and now the Budgie Desktop imaging not the
Widgets to close, minimize and maximize. I miss
Hello,
I have installed new Arch Linux and now the Budgie Desktop imaging not the
Widgets to close, minimize and maximize. I miss the complete window
decoration.
Have here someone a idea.
Silvio
Hi Dan,
> > I hope your local authorities decide to give you real broadband in
> > the near future, however. :-)
>
> My situation is similar to Darren's: My primary connection to the
> internet is through my cell phone carrier and a mobile WiFi hot spot.
I'm UK mainland, get about 580 KiB/s down
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019 07:11:31 -0500
Dan Sommers <2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
> On 3/16/19 7:03 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
>
> > What would be the Reason for the change to a slower less efficient
> > method apart from it may be someones pet toy ..
>
> It's only less efficie
On 3/16/19 7:03 AM, pete via arch-general wrote:
What would be the Reason for the change to a slower less efficient
method apart from it may be someones pet toy ..
It's only less efficient because networks are more faster
than CPUs. If I had a *multi-terabit* per second network,
and multi-*k
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 22:38:15 -0700
Adam Fontenot via arch-general wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's now been about half a year since support for zstd landed in our
> packaging tools. I've been quietly using it for all my locally built
> packages since then with no issues. I think it would be worthwhile to
>
On 3/16/19 1:30 AM, Adam Fontenot via arch-general wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:10 PM Darren Wu via arch-general
wrote:
I have 4Mbps (512KBytes/s) 'broad'band and i7-6500U CPU. I wanna cry.
Even in a worst-case scenario like this one, the Squash compression
test I linked to shows an in
9 matches
Mail list logo
