LinkedIn
General,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Alex Matviychuk
Alex Matviychuk
Software Engineer
Japan
Confirm that you know Alex Matviychuk
https://www.linkedin.com/e/j2jirp-gj2k8868-1k/isd/2161969956/yna0iLD9/
--
(c) 2010, Lin
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 13:10, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
> For such a crucial system package it would seem wise to deal with the
> devil that's easier to understand (in theory, I don't claim to
> understand the internals of e.
That should read:
For such a crucial system package
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:57, Loui Chang wrote:
> The only problem is finding someone who can do the work to maintain
> dcron. It's pretty damning to have a scheduler that can't schedule
> properly installed by default - that's what people seem to be concerned
> about mostly. I'd like to keep the
Thanks to this thread I decided to look at both dcron and fcron. First
google result for dcron led me to this:
1 Why use dcron when there's fcron?
---
- dcron is SIMPLE:
dcron just gives you two binaries, crond and crontab, and consists
only of a few
> Yes sure i believe it works, my concerns
> are more that the main tools just don't support it, which makes it imho more
> complicated to implement the installation support.
So here is what I needed to mess with to get it working:
Kernel:
"Version 2 of the filesystem, known as NILFS2, is include
I just spent some time setting up my new laptop with an SSD to use
NILFS2 as its root filesystem and I'm very pleased with the
performance.
In an effort to get better support for NILFS2 in arch I've added a
request to move nilfs-utils to the base group and submitted a patch to
initscripts to bring
6 matches
Mail list logo
