Re: [arch-general] [community] package needs rebuilding, bug report?

On 10/01/2010 02:27 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 01:40 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote: On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Hi all, With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, other

Re: [arch-general] [community] package needs rebuilding, bug report?

On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 01:40 +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] > > packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are > > out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run

Re: [arch-general] [community] package needs rebuilding, bug report?

On 10/01/2010 01:37 AM, Ng Oon-Ee wrote: Hi all, With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy

[arch-general] [community] package needs rebuilding, bug report?

Hi all, With the move of [gnome-unstable] stuff to [testing], some [community] packages (gnome-media-pulse, gnome-settings-daemon-pulse) are out-of-date, others (xiphos) no longer run due to depending on earlier versions of libs. Is that bug-report worthy, or can I assume the maintainers are aware