Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Dan McGee
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Brendan Long wrote: > On 02/05/2010 12:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: >> >> On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: >>> >>> So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The >>> xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because

Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Brendan Long
On 02/05/2010 12:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote: On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox

Re: [arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Ionut Biru
On 02/05/2010 09:51 PM, Brendan Long wrote: So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox-branded won't update because it needs a ne

[arch-general] AUR / Official Repo version problem

2010-02-05 Thread Brendan Long
So I've been having a strange problem on my computer with updates. The xulrunner package in the official repos didn't want to update because firefox-branded (from the AUR) depends on an old version, but firefox-branded won't update because it needs a newer version of xulrunner. I got it to work by