I use a central server for simply caching with NFS (as in the wiki
basicly) for five machines at home. And it works great and not having
to add other packages just feels more simple in my imho. Was unaware
about not being able to use the cache simultaneously though and has
never been an issue for m
I use apt-cacher-ng configured for archlinux repositories :)
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40662
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=120068
Thank you Gary, Simon.
Pacserve will be best solution if it works. I'll give it a try.
Also, NFS solution is OK because most of the time I'll run the update
automatically and I'll write a script to handle the timing.
2011/6/5 Simon Schneider :
> You can also share the pacman directory /var/cache/p
You can also share the pacman directory /var/cache/pacman/pkg via NFS or
some other protocol. Whenever a new package is requested, it gets downloaded
to your login node which stores it for later use in case another client
needs it. The drawback is, that you can't upgrade two machines at the same
ti
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Takayuki Muranushi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm building a computer cluster with about 20 nodes, all of them
> running ArchLinux. One of them is the 'login' node connected to the
> Internet, other nodes share Internet connection via the login node
> being a router.
> htt
Hello,
I'm building a computer cluster with about 20 nodes, all of them
running ArchLinux. One of them is the 'login' node connected to the
Internet, other nodes share Internet connection via the login node
being a router.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Internet_Share
Now, when I update the
6 matches
Mail list logo