On 6/16/19 4:21 PM, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
> On 16/06/2019 21:12, Marc Ranolfi via arch-general wrote:
>> I think it's also possible to have only one package (and two config files
>> 'config.i686' and 'config.x86_64'). But I don't know if that is good
>> practice.
>
> This is definitely possib
On 16/06/2019 21:12, Marc Ranolfi via arch-general wrote:
> I think it's also possible to have only one package (and two config files
> 'config.i686' and 'config.x86_64'). But I don't know if that is good
> practice.
This is definitely possible and the approach Manjaro currently uses for
`arch=(i6
Thank you David.
If I may ask a related question - considering this package would be most
useful for Arch Linux 32, how should I provide support for both x86_64 and
i686?
The kernel packages I've seen in the AUR only support x86_64.
Should I make two separate packages - i.e. one like "i686-
linu
On 06/15/2019 09:53 PM, Marc Ranolfi via arch-general wrote:
> I wonder if the following is acceptable:
>
> pkgname = linux-drm-openchrome-git
> pkgdesc = The Linux kernel and modules from the drm-openchrome tree - git
> version
>
That seems to meet all normal naming conventions and the descript
I wonder if the following is acceptable:
pkgname = linux-drm-openchrome-git
pkgdesc = The Linux kernel and modules from the drm-openchrome tree - git
version
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:50 PM Marc Ranolfi wrote:
> Hey guys.
>
> I'm planning on packaging the linux kernel with OpenChrome DRM suppo
Hey guys.
I'm planning on packaging the linux kernel with OpenChrome DRM support from
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/openchrome/drm-openchrome/ to share in the AUR.
What should I name the package?
1. linux-drm-openchrome-git
2. linux-drm-openchrome-next-git
And what should the description be? Som
6 matches
Mail list logo
