Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-13 Thread Sergej Pupykin
At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:01:08 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > So it is a deliberate choice to put it there. Fedora also does things > that way. Debian and Gentoo do it the opposite. > > So I am not sure what is the best here. Could you just use -h with > your tar? It is not problem. But it is st

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 13/08/10 21:30, Sergej Pupykin wrote: At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:20:32 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote: New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke something.

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-13 Thread Sergej Pupykin
At Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:20:32 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote: > > New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please > > try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke > > something. > > > Has anybody tested the v

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-13 Thread Allan McRae
On 04/08/10 15:37, Andreas Radke wrote: New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke something. Has anybody tested the version of mailman in [testing]? This will need to be moved before the py

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-08-03 Thread Andreas Radke
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke something. -Andy signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-25 Thread Allan McRae
On 24/07/10 02:55, Dan Vratil wrote: I tried the latest version of mailman (2.1.13) as you suggested. I used the PKGBUILD from SVN trunk, but I modified it, so that it does not require /home/mailman and mailman user and group to exist during build and I modified the mailman.install file so that u

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-23 Thread Dan Vratil
On Thursday 22 July 2010 00:21:24 Dan McGee wrote: > On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200 > > > > Dan Vratil wrote: > >> Hi, > >> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite > >> a long (at least since February 2009)

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-21 Thread Allan McRae
On 22/07/10 08:21, Dan McGee wrote: On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200 Dan Vratil wrote: Hi, please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version 2.1.13 from

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-21 Thread Dan McGee
On Wednesday, July 21, 2010, Ananda Samaddar wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200 > Dan Vratil wrote: > >> Hi, >> please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite >> a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version >> 2.1.13 from December 2009. >> >> Th

Re: [arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-21 Thread Ananda Samaddar
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:38:37 +0200 Dan Vratil wrote: > Hi, > please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite > a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version > 2.1.13 from December 2009. > > Thank you! > > Dan > > Flag it as out of date. Ananda

[arch-general] Mailman update

2010-07-21 Thread Dan Vratil
Hi, please, could someone update the mailman package? It's outdated quite a long (at least since February 2009) and there is a new version 2.1.13 from December 2009. Thank you! Dan -- - Dan Vrátil vra...@progdansoft.com ICQ 249163429 Jabber prog...@jabber.cz T