Re: [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-18 Thread Allan McRae
On 19/01/11 15:19, Kaiting Chen wrote: Okay everyone, every time I ask I get a different answer. According to Dziedzic and Allan 'glibc' does *not* belong in 'depends'. Also Dziedzic votes that *no* package in 'base' should be in 'depends'. Can we settle once and for all what the correct policy i

Re: [arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-18 Thread Pierre Schmitz
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:19:50 -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote: > Okay everyone, every time I ask I get a different answer. According to > Dziedzic and Allan 'glibc' does *not* belong in 'depends'. Also Dziedzic > votes that *no* package in 'base' should be in 'depends'. Can we settle once > and for all wh

[arch-general] Please settle 'base' in 'depends' for all

2011-01-18 Thread Kaiting Chen
Okay everyone, every time I ask I get a different answer. According to Dziedzic and Allan 'glibc' does *not* belong in 'depends'. Also Dziedzic votes that *no* package in 'base' should be in 'depends'. Can we settle once and for all what the correct policy is? And then can we update the wiki page a