Am Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:33:56 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke :
> 2.6.27.31-2 is up for both arches and _should_ fully support ext4
> filesystem. So far I couldn't reboot my ext4 system, because it's busy
> with uploading other stuff for some hours.
>
> Though I don't expect any trouble try it only wi
At Mittwoch 26 August 2009 20:46 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Now where in the arch boot process could I put a script that
> basically
says
> if uname -r is the lts kernel switch to nv and vice-versa?
/etc/rc.local:
if [ $(uname -r) = "2.6.27-lts" ]; then
# do what you need to use nv
fi
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 15:00, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:46, David C.
> Rankin wrote:
>> Now where in the arch boot process could I put a script that
>> basically says
>> if uname -r is the lts kernel switch to nv and vice-versa?
>>
> Nowhere. Since when do we modify
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:46, David C.
Rankin wrote:
> Now where in the arch boot process could I put a script that basically
> says
> if uname -r is the lts kernel switch to nv and vice-versa?
>
Nowhere. Since when do we modify user config files in this manner?
Making something robust wou
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 12:49:25 pm Xavier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:46 PM, David C.
>
> Rankin wrote:
> >If the nvidia driver is too much of a pain to maintain, the how
> > about the nv driver. That way all you would have to do is modify your
> > xorg.conf and change "nvidia"
2.6.27.31-2 is up for both arches and _should_ fully support ext4
filesystem. So far I couldn't reboot my ext4 system, because it's busy
with uploading other stuff for some hours.
Though I don't expect any trouble try it only with non critical ext4
root filesystem partitions. You've been warned.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:46 PM, David C.
Rankin wrote:
>
> If the nvidia driver is too much of a pain to maintain, the how about
> the nv
> driver. That way all you would have to do is modify your xorg.conf and change
> "nvidia" to "nv" and restart X if you wanted a gui on the lts kernel.
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 10:53:56 am Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:29, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > I half-way agree. The issue is that, no matter what you _intend_ with
> > something, people will always do something you don't expect. It's part
> > of the reason you see warnings
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 02:54:50 am Thomas Bächler wrote:
> David C. Rankin schrieb:
> > How do you handle the situation where you are running the nvidia
>
> driver on
>
> > the normal kernel and then boot to the lts kernel? The kernel boots fine,
> > but X is dead, presumably because the
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:29, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I half-way agree. The issue is that, no matter what you _intend_ with
> something, people will always do something you don't expect. It's part
> of the reason you see warnings like "Do not put in nose" on a package
> for an electric toothbrush :
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:29 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I half-way agree. The issue is that, no matter what you _intend_ with
> something, people will always do something you don't expect. It's part
> of the reason you see warnings like "Do not put in nose" on a package
> for an electric toothbru
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:25 AM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> On 08/26/2009 02:23 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
>>
>> Andreas,
>>
>> How do you handle the situation where you are running the nvidia
>> driver on the normal kernel and then boot to the lts kernel? The kernel
>> boots fine, but X i
On 08/26/2009 02:23 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Andreas,
How do you handle the situation where you are running the nvidia driver on
the normal kernel and then boot to the lts kernel? The kernel boots fine, but
X is dead, presumably because the nvidia driver isn't compiled against that
kernel
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> 2) a fallback kernel für almost everybody: a long requested feature.
> Everybody can install it along the core "kernel26" pkg and add
> lilo/grub entries for the "lts" kernel. Whenever an update of a future
> kernel26 will fail you won't be fo
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:05, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 26 August 2009 09:54:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
>> You don't. It's a kernel meant for servers, there won't be any module
>> packages for it. A machine that needs the nvidia driver is not a server.
>
> Maybe the kernel should be rena
Am Mittwoch 26 August 2009 09:54:50 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
> You don't. It's a kernel meant for servers, there won't be any module
> packages for it. A machine that needs the nvidia driver is not a server.
Maybe the kernel should be renamed to -server then. -lts is a little confusing
here.
--
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:34:32AM +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Today I've added a 2nd kernel to our svn called "kernel26-lts". It
> should help to make you less caring about kernel updates. The intention
> is to
Does this kernel have PAE support compiled in?
Regards
Milos
David C. Rankin schrieb:
> How do you handle the situation where you are running the nvidia
driver on
the normal kernel and then boot to the lts kernel? The kernel boots fine, but
X is dead, presumably because the nvidia driver isn't compiled against that
kernel and laughs when you tell it to
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 05:15:54 pm Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:34:32 +0200
>
> schrieb Andreas Radke :
> > I will upload packages for both architectures to testing over the next
> > days. Please discuss when you want see changes to the config file
> > (x86_64 is done, i686 is
Am Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:34:32 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke :
> I will upload packages for both architectures to testing over the next
> days. Please discuss when you want see changes to the config file
> (x86_64 is done, i686 is not ready so far).
>
> -Andy
>
i686 is now also done and ready for
On 08/25/2009 09:34 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
On Monday 24 August 2009 06:34:32 pm Andreas Radke wrote:
Today I've added a 2nd kernel to our svn called "kernel26-lts". It
should help to make you less caring about kernel updates. The
intention is to
1) have a 2nd choice for the kernel pkg that
On Monday 24 August 2009 06:34:32 pm Andreas Radke wrote:
> Today I've added a 2nd kernel to our svn called "kernel26-lts". It
> should help to make you less caring about kernel updates. The intention
> is to
>
> 1) have a 2nd choice for the kernel pkg that suits better in
> certain situations an
Andreas Radke wrote:
Today I've added a 2nd kernel to our svn called "kernel26-lts". It
should help to make you less caring about kernel updates. The intention
is to
1) have a 2nd choice for the kernel pkg that suits better in
certain situations and
2) it can be a fallback when a reboot aft
Today I've added a 2nd kernel to our svn called "kernel26-lts". It
should help to make you less caring about kernel updates. The intention
is to
1) have a 2nd choice for the kernel pkg that suits better in
certain situations and
2) it can be a fallback when a reboot after updating the core
"ker
24 matches
Mail list logo
