--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "radio881gal" wrote:
>
> As I understood the lawyer's point in the courtroom, there is a 12 month time
> limit from the time the rights holder takes title to the property, buys it,
> until he puts something on it.
> I agree, I too was unaware of such a time
As I understood the lawyer's point in the courtroom, there is a 12 month time
limit from the time the rights holder takes title to the property, buys it,
until he puts something on it.
I agree, I too was unaware of such a time limit, since many people have
criticized the plan for not having suc
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "radio881gal" wrote:
>
> That surprises me since in my report on the court hearing - Bon Mots Flew
> Over Freehold - I noted the lawyers representing Asbury said that "There had
> been no 'ground up' development since, despite a deadline of 12 months,
> acco
I can see why the judge gave it over to arbitration.
The concept of a city plan is good. I don't really see how it differs from the
"current plan".
Creates more options for development within various zones, allows exceptions to
the zones, makes no mention fo contributions to overall infrastruct
NOt that I'm the world's best speller, but I'm only on page 7 of the this
propsosal and I have a hard time getting past spelling errors.
Since I did spend some time writing tech docs and system requriements along
with budget reports in past lives, I was told never to stick your name on it
until
if the development rights were upheld, part of those rights were/are to
take other's property. At least the last few rounds of purchases upheld by the
courts were pretty "fair" dollar wise. That is, if you really want to be forced
out. You're not talking 1980 dollars any more.
--- In Asbur
That surprises me since in my report on the court hearing - Bon Mots Flew Over
Freehold - I noted the lawyers representing Asbury said that "There had been no
'ground up' development since, despite a deadline of 12 months, according to
the agreement, to develop or find a subsequent redeveloper."
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "radio881gal" wrote:
>
> Spelled out in 47-page 'Concepts' document that was filed with court papers.
> More At http://www.AsburyRadio.com
> Best,
> Maureen
>
Thanks Maureen. A very interesting read. Gives (suggested for amended plan)
master developer 18-mon
Spelled out in 47-page 'Concepts' document that was filed with court papers.
More At http://www.AsburyRadio.com
Best,
Maureen
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email sett
