Well, I see we agree.
I responded to your point how some people have "NO KIDS" using the
resources as if therefore, those people shouldn;t be obligated to pay their
portion of school taxes - or garbage, ems etc
And my the $84,000 note was in response to a asburyparksun.com and APP artic
It's not a selective tax for the resident. That would be contrary to state tax
policy. Rather, an abatement program is an option for troubled cities or areas
to use financial tools to spur investment and development. The choice is that
of the City, not the resident, to implement the plan.
No
Doug wrote...
"What's more, at least at Wesley Grove, there is NOT ONE KID in the school
system using up those precious resources. Add to that the fact that those
buildings are new and modern, which means they are less of a risk and burden to
the City fire department. "
Doug, I guess Dan and W
Thanks for the response.
Neither one of us are "right".
That being said -
1. the structure of the "property tax" in the US is not to be a "selective"
method of picking and choosing what services are used - like the school system.
I heard that argument before from people in deal, colts neck in
