> The WRP calls for a "public" beach club in the 2nd Ave pavillion.<<<
The WRP called for a bunch of stuff.
No time line for a beach club. You don't even need a "club". Just a
place for a family to come, enjoy the day. Then, maybe, if they had a
chance to clean-up, they might viist somewhere i
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>-- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" wrote:
> >
> > Here's an idea for it and should of been in the agreement.
> >
> > How about restoring it as a bathhouse - you know, one the public
> could
> > use to shower
"the 2nd and 3rd ave pavilions had rear decks
with bathrooms off the back or west side"
A-ha! Yes, that sounds familar now. I was probably 5, if not less when all
this was still open (barley)
-
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the lat
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's an idea for it and should of been in the agreement.
>
> How about restoring it as a bathhouse - you know, one the public
could
> use to shower and sh_t?
>
> The basement was used for lifeguard room, the upper flo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Gary Wien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of my biggest problems with Asbury Partners was them having
their
> office space there. If you're in control of a billion dollar
> rennovation you could spend a hundred dollars on a nice sign for
your
> busines
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> It sounds like your're talking about the one behind the berkley
hotel. I was talking about the one that houses Asbury Partners and
Metro homes. I thought that was the one that Oakdorf was originaly
talking abo
"every pavilion had public restrooms,in the 80s that pavilion
consisted of johnathans, kohrs, duckys(thrown out by carabreeta,, ,, the
main beach bathiing facility which included ticket sales, lifeguard
rooms, showers, and locker facilities for the public, rental space for
beach umbrellas and r
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "The basement was used for lifeguard room, the upper floor for the
> bathhouse as was the basement. It had a tunnel that led out to the
> beach."
>
> Are you talking about the asbury partners building? Didn't
kn
"Then why don't you think it would have been put to use had they not
taken it? Isn't it easier to move people into a pavillion in good
shape over ones in poor shape?"
i was stating facts and posting statements. i didn't post my oppion. but, i
feel it would have most likley been left empt
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:11 PM, charlie wrote:
>
> Asbury Partners only chose that pavillion as their offices
> because that was the past location of Ocean Mile.
Yeah, that was a good omen, wasn't it?
> It was already set up. They did a few cosmetic changed and moved
> right in. There
"It was me and yes I have info. It is not only possible, but it was a
big mistake to be closed in the first place. MM wants it and will/has
already asked the city about it."
Oh all right, there you are. That's good to hear then. Hope it happens.
-
8:0
"Are you kidding? That pavillion seemed to be in fine shape --
certainly good enough that Asbury Partners chose to put their offices
there several years ago. Meanwhile we have retail stores in
pavillions with leaky roofs and bad plumbing. That pavillion could
definitely have been used for other
"Are you kidding? That pavillion seemed to be in fine shape --
certainly good enough that Asbury Partners chose to put their offices
there several years ago. Meanwhile we have retail stores in
pavillions with leaky roofs and bad plumbing. That pavillion could
definitely have been used for other
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Gary Wien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> One of my biggest problems with Asbury Partners was them having
their
> office space there. If you're in control of a billion dollar
> rennovation you could spend a hundred dollars on a nice sign for
your
> busi
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Werner, do you have any inside info on the "Fact" that MM
wants Lake ave. reopened? What are the chances of that acutally
happening? Forgot who posted it, but they didnt come back at me with a
reason behind what t
> But, its agreeded that the pavillion would be better used for
> a "Real" reason. But, do you really think anything would have been
> done with that half of the Asbury Partners pavillion anyway?
> highly doubted. It's being put to a functional use, compared to
> nothing at all.
>
"Metro selling the units will help the city. The more contracts, the faster the
building goes up c/o's issued (more ratables) and taxes collected. That
building was WASTE for all this time. At least now it will dirve people to
the boradwalk. Think about it, Metro is advertising, people will
i took some pictures yesterday, i just added them to the photo section for
anyone who can't see in person.
-
Looking for earth-friendly autos?
Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.
thue pavilion would be best used in a different way, of course. But, also
consider the Asbury Partners offices are there too (their not going anywhere).
The whole building might as well be offices, keep it all together. Image if
they chose to use a portion of a different pavillion! Then we'd
will come to the
sales office and then maybe walk around the borads.
- Original Message
From: wernerapnj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, April 9, 2007 12:25:11 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: 4th ave pav
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, charlie wr
"The building is not even built yet !
Nice of you to want Metro sell faster.
But -
The purpose of redevelopment is to HELP THE CITY.
Wouldn't rehabing the pavilion into a business filled fully assesed
and taxed comercial building HELP THE CITY more ??
We are going to choke on taxes due to lack of
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No matter how it looks, it will probably help Metro homes sell
faster.
===
The building is not even built yet !
Nice of you to want Metro sell faster.
But -
No matter how it looks, it will probably help Metro homes sell faster. It's a
good location for an office, right behind the project. People going to the
office can first hand see their future residence being built behind them.
Thats a neat aspect. The support part is bad though, i didnt exp
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyone catch the "new" 4th ave pav?
>
> The wallpaper is up.
>
==
Another issue:
Will these improvements now trigger a re-valuation for tax purposes as
ha
I had high hopes for it, but it just seems kinda patched together. Also, when
you are
approaching from North and South, you can see the backs of the ugly framework
of the
portions on top of the pavillion.
Ugh...
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyone catch the "new" 4th ave pav?
>
> The wallpaper is up.
>
=
=
Just came from there.
A few thoughts come to mind.
- Tacky
- Gaudy
- Silly
- Waste of
26 matches
Mail list logo
