[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread sandy
-Sign me up for the recall petition! <]:~) -- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > There certainly is an "adopted plan". The process was followed > > (assuming for the moment it wa

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread Skip Bernstein
"There is no discussion that it was amended from some date before 1/16/2002 (given to PB) to 3/15/2002. That's it. The only dates are 1/16/2002 and 4/26/2002. Where did this 3/15/2002 plan come from? That is not what the ordinance adopted. It adopted whatever plan was given to the PB on 1/16/2002,

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There certainly is an "adopted plan". The process was followed > (assuming for the moment it was the correct process) and resolutiond > were passed. > > The Offical Adopted Plan is the one on file at the City Clerks >

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread sandy
The Asbury Park city clerk is a man who is unsure of what he is doing. It took me over a week to get info from him that should have taken only a day. Don't get me wrong, he is a nice guy but he is a couple of Buds short of a six-pack. He is definately not controlling the strings in that office.

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread Skip Bernstein
"The Clerks Office is, by law, the official keeper of the City Record. One should (assuming the Clerks Office is functioning properly) get a copy of the Adopted Plan which was officially logged and filed." "…where this goes." Where we go is to `never never land'; that "official anythings" rem

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread wernerapnj
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > now that we > know that there is no "adopted" or `Official Plan' plan, there would > have been no necessity to pull or reduce anything; the Fish may have > inadvertently missed squeezing a few more big bucks from Asbur

[AsburyPark] Re: Another AP Icon Demolished - no “adopted” or ‘Official Plan’ plan

2005-10-05 Thread Skip Bernstein
"It would have been a higher density than permitted under the "adopted" plan. But that's OK it would have pulled density out of the beachfront area which is a good thing." Not so fast re "pulled density out of the beachfront", now that we know that there is no "adopted" or `Official Plan' plan, th