--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think this is the end of the cases for now, although I might be
> > bringing one. It was never a valid reason for Asbury Partners not
to
>
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> The case we are all talking about still has time to go to the Supreme
> Court. I guess we need to hear from the litigants about their
> intentions to no if it is really over.
>
Will the Supreme Court even hear a 3
The case we are all talking about still has time to go to the Supreme
Court. I guess we need to hear from the litigants about their
intentions to no if it is really over.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think this is the end of the cases for now, although I might be
> bringing one. It was never a valid reason for Asbury Partners not to
> proceed. The only obstacles to them building the waterfront are
> stupidity, g
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Abate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> So does this mean there is nothing pending? All the cases have been
decided
> and AP Partners are in the clear to proceed?
>
I think this is the end of the cases for now, although I might be
bringing one. It was n
