Just adding an AMEN to this!
Sharon
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Skip Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Allen, what makes you think The Fishman has any interest in the
> feelings of Asbury's residents?
>
> This is a "smash and grab" development; The Fish's soul intent is to
> maxi
i dont think HE does, but there is a core group of
INTELLIGENT, THOUGHTFUL FOLKS THAT CARE, and some that
would like to make some $$, and/or see the town get
its due, but in a way that preserves its character and
its class and its past, and allows the town to have
pride in itself again. WE NEED TO
Allen, what makes you think The Fishman has any interest in the
feelings of Asbury's residents?
This is a "smash and grab" development; The Fish's soul intent is to
maximize his return on a thirty year option to grab property at 2001
prices; even if he had the talent or skills necessary to reali
Perhaps someone could foward these cogent and
topically related articles from APP and elsewhere to
the folks at Madison Marquette and Rockwell, and other
historically relevant readings so they can get a
better feel for the history of AP and the feeling of
its residents regarding preserving its char
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I've been asserting that very point from day one. The lands East
of
> Ocean Ave were sold to the City by Bradley at such a low price
> ($100,000) that it was considered a gift to the City.
>
> In the deed is a claus
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You know I wasn't suggesting that. BTW, taking a quick look, I
think
> NJ's Public Trust Doctrine is strong but like NY's early case law,
> focuses on navigable waters and most recently on beach access. It
is
> diffi
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Preservationists, do not 'turn back the clock', impede development,
> keep things as they are... or any of the other miscaracterizations
> used.
You know I wasn't suggesting that. BTW, taking a quick look, I think
N
The notion that the Historic Buildings on our oceanfront can be
considered sepately from an overall revelopment plan is what the
larger problem is.
At issue is the context that they will be displayed in and how one
builds on the existing value presented by the buildings, context and
historic l
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> This small article makes me feel somewhat vindicated in my
advocacy
> for a preservation based redevelopment plan. A stance that
resulted
> in my exile from City affairs.
A pyrrhic vindication at best. I guess i
