--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" wrote:
>
> Ok -
>
> First file uploaded. 83 properties under "Asbury Partners LLC"
>
> Go to files section
>
--
Thanks I'll have to fire up my Windows PC to access it.
Werner
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "oakdorf" wrote:
>
> On the files section looks like I did this in 2003
>
> Exactly what are the boundries you want to see.
>
>
---
Boundaries would be the Redevelopment Area (the 'blighted are
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" wrote:
> >
> > As litigation and the Advisory Committee move forward it will be very
> > useful to know the ownership of properties, in particular how much
> > property, are they con
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" wrote:
>
> As litigation and the Advisory Committee move forward it will be very useful
> to know the ownership of properties, in particular how much property, are
> they contiguous lots, are they individuals or corporations, can Eminent
> Domai
then you have of course:
1. Stone Pony Partners
2. Talking Partners (216 Cookman)
3. WhiteFish Partners
4. Skyy6 Holdings (same Mail address as rest - 511 Ocean Ave (owing 1244
Washington Ave)
5. AP Fifteen (214 Cookman)
6. AP Five (201-203 Eigth Ave)
7. MF III Albion showing them as owners 105 2
On the files section looks like I did this in 2003
Exactly what are the boundries you want to see.
To me an LLC is where it ends. YOu MIGHT be able to see some members or
managing members of an llc, but overall it's meaningless.
Don't know about you, but I a ton of work from everything I
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" wrote:
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, gtscarano212@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Property owners need protection
> > >
> > Today The Deli tomorrow The Baronet and so and so on.
>>Leaving the meeting last night, outside Bruno told me to go back to
NY and "get out of HIS town." Nice attitude for a Deputy Mayor.
Citizens ought to wake up and see how they are being represented.
Typical bs.
At least a couple tough talking thugs didn't pull up next to you and
tell you get ou
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Lighty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Maybe make Asbury Partners finish the properties they are required
to
> restore before letting them acquire more properties/land. That
would have
> been a nice part of the revised deal. No more emminent domain
UNTIL
>>
>>> Property owners need protection
>>>
>> Today The Deli tomorrow The Baronet and so and so on.
Can there at least be a cease fire?
Maybe make Asbury Partners finish the properties they are required to
restore before letting them acquire more properties/land. That would have
been a nice p
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, gtscarano212@ wrote:
> >
> > Property owners need protection
> >
> Today The Deli tomorrow The Baronet and so and so on.
>
Unfortunately so. Loffredo, Sanders and Bruno will just not listen
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Property owners need protection
>
Today The Deli tomorrow The Baronet and so and so on.
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 05/4/06
> Eminent domain â" the taking of private property for public use
â" is as much about people as
read that as well. Here, the logical reason is that this area has no real
blight. The only blight
here, it's on the waterwait a minute
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http
"I wish folks were more familiar with what was given up in the name of
primarily residential development."
All was given up in the name of those delightful cartoon characters;
that's Larry's legacy to Asbury Park.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ba
Bad form Dan, each plan version, or amendment as they are refered to,
stands on it's own. One can not refer to a conglomeration of sequencial
plans as having any binding effect.
If the current version were to be struck down, the 1991 version would
prevail as the effective land use plan. Don't k
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "wernerapnj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the interests of accuracy, there is no such thing as "the 1984/91
> plan".
>
> The original '1984 plan' was superceded by the '1987 plan' which was
> superceded by the '1991 plan'.
>
I was incorporating all of th
In the interests of accuracy, there is no such thing as "the 1984/91
plan".
The original '1984 plan' was superceded by the '1987 plan' which was
superceded by the '1991 plan'.
The 'current plan' did not build upon the knowledge base of the '1991
plan', instead a contract was entered into (the
"Long Branch chugged along regardless of lawsuits. Ugly as it may be,
you see the words SOLD OUT."
Think Long Branch is ugly, have you seen the crap they're building at
Wesley Lake?
Looks like subdivision housing in Jackson; if that's the best they can
do on a lake view site, wait till they sta
Funny how some more REAL developers (a guy that tell a hammer from a
screwdriver) in Long Branch chugged along regardless of lawsuits.
Ugly as it may be, you see the words SOLD OUT. The beachfront is
generating tax dollars and long branch has a slew of new schools.
Go to Hollywood Beach Florid
"But when they will be developed is anybody's guess
because 56 acres
of waterfront property surrounding their properties was held in limbo
by litigation and ineffective attempts by then city officials to get
the development rights back. The Monmouth County courts are either
blind
or crooked that
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> One of the city's main arguments has been a plan to develop about
28 blocks
> on the milelong coastline in a unified block-by-block manner,
rather than
> parcel by parcel.
But when they will be developed is anybody's guess.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> God bless you Rev Kev
>
> Sitting in Niagara Falls waiting to go on stand. My ballot's in.
I hope you brought a towel, silly!!!
When you get back, The McCloones Pier House will be open in Pier
Village. My treat!!!
I sp
God bless you Rev Kev
Sitting in Niagara Falls waiting to go on stand. My ballot's in.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of
23 matches
Mail list logo
