[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS-Term Limits

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I disagree. You are referring to who can be on a ballot, which is > different than who can be a candidate. There are candidates out there > who aren't on the ballot, and anyone can take office if they win the

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS-Term Limits

2005-11-07 Thread bluebishop82
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Term limits are an even worse idea. I don't like any law that takes > > away my right to vote for who I want. > > > There are laws

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS-Term Limits

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Term limits are an even worse idea. I don't like any law that takes > away my right to vote for who I want. > There are laws already in place that limit who you can vote for. Are there not laws limiting who can be

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS-Term Limits

2005-11-07 Thread bluebishop82
Term limits are an even worse idea. I don't like any law that takes away my right to vote for who I want. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILA

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In answer to the above, I make an observation about governance in > general: Throughout history, never does a group in power > voluntarily cede said power to another group. Power transfers only > with a vote whe

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS

2005-11-07 Thread bluebishop82
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom, I'm glad you posted this, reminded me to compliment you on your > article in opposition to staggered terms. Your ward system has its > appeal, however, I am a little concerned with a large part of your > rationale.

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Let's not get off the central issue: Staggered Terms is a bad idea. > Vote NO! tomorrow against staggered terms (as often as you can ;-]). > Tom, I'm glad you posted this, reminded me to compliment you on your art

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS

2005-11-07 Thread bluebishop82
Let's not get off the central issue: Staggered Terms is a bad idea. Vote NO! tomorrow against staggered terms (as often as you can ;-]). Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http:/

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS.... deep pockets?

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Joe D'Andrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been contacted by Jim Bruno on the issue of whether or not a candidate committee can spend campaign money on defeating a ballot question and he tells me that according to "the Election Office" the Future Is He

[AsburyPark] Re: STAGGER TERMS.... deep pockets?

2005-11-07 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Joe D'Andrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been contacted by Jim Bruno on the issue of whether or not a candidate committee can spend campaign money on defeating a ballot question and he tells me that according to "the Election Office" the Future Is Here