[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Lighthouse Mission" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is the property where the JDRM exempt from property tax? > > LMS > This is not the assessor's office. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Asbur

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread Lighthouse Mission
Is the property where the JDRM exempt from property tax? LMS Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You could be right, because I am not an attorney. > > It would require an ex parte' Order! Ex parte means "for one party," and refers to motions, hearings or orders granted on the request of and for the benefit of on

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread rogersduncan
You could be right, because I am not an attorney. It would require an ex parte' Order! What I find interesting, is that the mission appealed originally in chancellry (sp) where Lehre presided. How come yesterday's decision was made in Lawson's Law Division. Do you know the reason for that? RD

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That's if the State Supreme or Federal Court does not issue a Summary > Judgement allowing the mission to remain open. > RD > Summary Judgment? That's a court order that no factual issues remain to be tried and ther

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-26 Thread rogersduncan
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" > wrote: > > > > "The victory for Asbury Park is that an appeal could go on for years > > and all that time the city would be affected by the impact of the > > mission

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-25 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "The victory for Asbury Park is that an appeal could go on for years > and all that time the city would be affected by the impact of the > mission during that time,'' Reidy said. "We'll see what the mission > does o

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-25 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycouple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FREEHOLD — State Superior Court Judge Lawrence Lawson today upheld > Asbury Park's administrative directive last week for the Jersey Shore > Rescue Mission to close after city zoners voted unanimously to deny > the

[AsburyPark] Re: Thank you everyone who stood up for Asbury!

2007-10-25 Thread rogersduncan
"The victory for Asbury Park is that an appeal could go on for years and all that time the city would be affected by the impact of the mission during that time,'' Reidy said. "We'll see what the mission does on appeal.'' --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburycouple" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr